How To Evaluate Tech Talent In A Rapidly Changing Workplace

Replace Annual Reviews With Ongoing Skills Assessments

Technical roles change so fast that annual reviews may assess skills that are no longer relevant. Instead, employees must identify what they need to learn and go learn it. Leaders should run ongoing assessments to track this, paying close attention to who needs support to develop self-direction. Quantitative metrics, like AI adoption rates and time-to-competency on new tools, complete the picture. - Andrew Sales, Scaled Agile

Prioritize Adaptability And Open-Minded Learning

Adaptability is the key now. People who can quickly adopt new technologies are key. Keeping an open mind about different perspectives and possibilities, along with having a good feel of what’s feasible and logical, is also a must. - Rafael Pimentel Pinto, Texas State Board of Pharmacy

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Assess Cross-Functional Delivery Skills

The future belongs to the wide, not the narrow. Evaluate talent on core cultural principles that promote more cross-organizational delivery, like ownership, curiosity, communication and outcome-focused risk-taking. - Cyrus Wadia, Activate

Measure Speed To Real-World Impact

Leaders should rethink technical evaluation around time to value and real-world impact. The real question isn’t just what engineers know; it’s how quickly they can turn ideas into meaningful outcomes. - Prashanthi Nuthi, Enlace Health

Evaluate AI Visibility And Governance Skills

As AI moves beyond basic prompting into agentic systems, success depends on visibility, control and accountability. Our company’s 2026 IT Trends Report found that only 5% of respondents say AI is core to operations, while 61% discover unauthorized SaaS monthly. With shadow AI potentially outpacing sanctioned adoption, leaders should measure how well teams can surface, map and govern it before it becomes a liability. - Douglas Murray, Auvik

Measure Ownership Of High-Impact Systems

Leaders should evaluate engineers on impact density: who owns critical systems, improves reliability under real load, reduces infrastructure costs, and delivers measurable customer outcomes. In fast-changing environments, the edge is applying past expertise, learning fast and turning ambiguity into scalable, production-grade solutions. - Dhruv Seth, Walmart Global Tech

Test Output With Emerging Capabilities

AI has collapsed the half-life of technical skills. Certifications now tell you where someone was, not where they’re going. The rethink: Add a quarterly output assessment, assign a real deliverable using an emerging capability, score it against a defined standard, and track improvement over time. What someone produces with something unfamiliar is the only forward-looking metric on the table. - Kiran Bhujle, SVAM International Inc.

Prioritize Judgment Over Output Volume

Most performance metrics reward speed and output volume—the first capabilities AI commoditizes. Evaluate your people on judgment instead: Can they frame the right problem, direct AI toward the answer, and catch what it gets wrong? Training creates awareness, not competency. Only applied experience does that. - Joseph Ours, Centric Consulting

Validate Skills Through Real-World Problem-Solving

Leaders should shift from static, role-based metrics to continuous, real-world skill validation, evaluating talent through live problem-solving, simulations and on-the-job outcomes rather than résumés or annual reviews. This approach captures actual capability, adaptability and decision-making in context, which traditional metrics often miss. - Anusha Nerella

Track Long-Term System Performance

Instead of reviewing résumés of past skills, leaders should examine system impact over time. The key question is whether an engineer’s work improves reliability, scalability and operational clarity months after deployment. Evaluating how systems perform under real production conditions reveals deeper technical judgment than short-term delivery metrics or stack expertise. - Amirtha Saminathan, Lowe’s

Test Decision Durability Under Pressure

Leaders should move beyond assessing skills in controlled settings and evaluate engineers in production-like conditions. The real signal is “decision durability”: Do their choices hold under scale, failure and volatility? Engineers who build systems that degrade gracefully and stand the test of time create far more value than those chasing the latest tools. - Ajay Pandey

Measure How Well People Define Problems

Stop measuring what people built and start measuring what they figured out. At an early-stage company, our best engineers aren’t the ones who ship the most code—they’re the ones who identify which problem actually needs solving. We evaluate on ambiguity resolved: how well someone takes a vague business need and turns it into a scoped, shippable solution without waiting for a spec. - Victor Mimo, Mira Mace

Assess Learning Velocity In Messy Conditions

I’d grade technical talent less like a snapshot and more like airport security: What matters is what gets through under pressure. Measure learning velocity in live, messy situations. Give people a new tool, vague requirements and one week. Score how fast they adapt, ask smart questions and still protect the customer experience. - Joel Frenette, TravelFun.Biz

Evaluate Postmortem Quality And Accountability

Leaders should score engineers on postmortem quality, not just deliverables. When a system fails, can the engineer trace the root cause accurately, communicate it clearly and propose structural fixes rather than surface patches? That accountability loop reveals far more about long-term judgment and future readiness than any performance review built entirely upon delivery metrics and task completions. - Jagadish Gokavarapu, Wissen Infotech

Prioritize Growth Rate Over Credentials

Shift from credentials to contribution velocity. In fast-moving technical landscapes, what someone learns matters less than how fast they learn and apply. Evaluate adaptability—how quickly they’ve pivoted skills, adopted new tools or led through ambiguity. The best signal isn’t their résumé; it’s their rate of growth. - Monisha Somji

Measure Skill Acquisition And Transfer

Stop scoring people only on what they already know. Score them on how fast they turn unfamiliar tech into reliable outcomes. A useful lens is a skill migration index: the time to learn, apply and teach a new tool or domain. In fast-changing tech, adaptability is the new depth. - Akhilesh Sharma, A3Logics Inc.

Evaluate Problem Selection Before Execution

Everyone’s chasing “learning velocity,” but speed without direction is just well-credentialed thrashing. The harder skill to measure—and the one that actually matters—is problem selection: Can this person figure out what’s worth building before writing a line of code? We’ve seen teams ship fast and fail because nobody questioned whether the thing should exist. Evaluate judgment, not pace. - Andrew Siemer, Inventive

Assess Range Across Unfamiliar Problems

Stop rewarding static expertise and start measuring problem range. Ask how often someone steps into unfamiliar domains, learns fast and delivers anyway. In a shifting landscape, the signal isn’t mastery of one stack. It’s the ability to navigate ambiguity and still ship with sound judgment. - Dan Haiem, AppMakers USA

Prioritize Decision Quality Under Uncertainty

Leaders must shift from measuring output volume to decision quality and judgment under uncertainty. The critical metric—how effectively individuals navigate trade-offs (technical debt versus velocity)—is revealed through decision records and post-mortems. This surfaces strategic acumen and architectural foresight. - Garima Singh, Royal Bank of Canada

Measure How Individuals Elevate Team Performance

Evaluate how often someone makes others faster. The best engineers aren’t just productive—they reduce ambiguity, unblock decisions and raise the team’s baseline. In a shifting landscape, leverage over others matters more than individual output on a fixed stack. - William Gao, HumanTouch