Glean reposted this
I ❤️ Glean. I also pity the poor internal champion who has to sell it as “better internal search.” That feels technically true in the same way a dishwasher is “a wetter cabinet.” I use Glean every day at Zapier. It helps me find context, understand history, avoid bothering the same five people, and increasingly, it acts as a context layer for agents I’m building in Zapier’s internal agent harness, which is in closed beta right now. And that is where the ROI conversation gets weird. Because the value is real. But if the pitch becomes “people searched more,” I think we are measuring the receipt instead of the thing we actually bought. Some rough thoughts I’m playing with: 1. Measure the wandering that stopped happening. How often did someone get stuck before finding the right doc, owner, prior decision, or example? 2. Measure the interruptions that disappeared. How many “do you know where this lives?” Slack messages no longer need to happen because the context is findable? 3. Measure agent and automation velocity. How many people started building a useful automation or agent and got blocked because they could not find the right process context, policy, field definition, workflow history, or edge case? Then measure that again after Glean becomes part of the context layer. 4. Measure duplicate work avoided. How often did someone discover that the thing they were about to build, write, document, or decide already existed somewhere? The hard part is that this kind of infrastructure removes a tax most companies were never measuring. Before Glean, nobody had a dashboard for “minutes spent spelunking through Slack like a corporate raccoon.” But that time was never free. I’m genuinely interested in how others are thinking about this, especially as these tools become less “search box” and more “context infrastructure for AI work.” Jonathan Goldberg, you’ve done an amazing Glean rollout at HHX and I’d love your take. How are you measuring the value beyond usage?