User talk:GearsDatapacks

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Welcome!

Hi GearsDatapack! I noticed your contributions to Bus (computing) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 14:15, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Thank you for the welcome. I've looked around a bit, but the links you provided are very helpful! Thank you GearsDatapack (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm trying to improve the Digital television page. After going around and around the last week or so with an editor deleting my edits in bulk because he thought I had a COI, I almost gave up out of frustration but because I really want to see this page improved, I disclosed a potential COI on my user page with an in-depth explanation. Then, I went back to the digital television page and instead of posting edits within the actual article/page, I went to the talk page and proposed a new subject disclosing my potential COI again upfront, and then proposed some substantive edits, trying to bring in one or more other editors to discuss, and hopefully weigh in on these proposed edits in order to improve the digital television page. Can you please look at what I just described and see if it makes sense and whether I did it correctly? Thank you! --MtdigitalTV (talk) 21:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yep, looks like you did the right thing in posting the suggested edit on the talk page. A couple things I'd note about your request though:

• I would use the {{Edit COI}} template at the top, as that puts in in a queue of COI requested edits (albeit a long one) and makes it more likely to be reviewed.
• In order to maximise your chance of your request being accepted, I would try to cut down the request as much as possible, including removing the COI disclosure at the top. Just saying you have a COI is enough info for anyone.
• If possible, I would recommend you add web links to your citations where the information is online. It's very hard to verify the claims with no information on how to find the sources.
• The way you've currently written the proposed additions doesn't feel like quite the correct encyclopedic style that Wikipedia uses. You've gone into quite a lot of detail that probably isn't needed (you want to be summarising the most important information from sources). You've also used quite a few of the words to watch, which is generally an indicator of non-neutral writing.

Hopefully that helps! {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 21:42, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, your comments were helpful. I edited the proposed additions accordingly (as much as I could) on the Digital television talk page. Please check when you get a chance.MtdigitalTV (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

On 9 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amanda Coulson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Amanda Coulson (pictured) worked full-time as an emergency dispatcher during her career as an amateur boxer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amanda Coulson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amanda Coulson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

On 9 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ig Nobel Prize, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that winners of the Ig Nobel Prize are silenced by an eight-year-old girl repeating "Please stop. I'm bored" if their acceptance speeches go on for too long? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ig Nobel Prize. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ig Nobel Prize), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 18,406 views (766.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion.

Note that other articles in Category:BAUHAUS-galan, as well as the category itself, should be renamed. 162 etc. (talk) 01:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ah yes thank you for reminding me! I've moved the other pages and tagged the category for speedy moving. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 07:46, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Chiasmus (diambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 12 § Chiasmus (diambiguation) until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Help me get these people to stop nuking my updates.. I added a massive amount of local history and because i reformatted the entire page with Ai instead of adding edits to each section manually every single edit i did was removed. Im adding local historical information.. Not general Ai scraped nonsense. --UnnameableMedia (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I suggest you stop using AI to make edits as AI is not allowed on Wikipedia. I would also strongly caution you to remain calm and refrain from attacking or threatening other editors as that is certainly not helping your case. Try to be civil and engage constructively with the other editors. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 16:50, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Is using a Google search a LLM? If i add an entire history to the stub local page. What do you want me to do write thousands of lines of code to update it manually? There was no substantive review process of the content of the material. How was anyone engaging constructively with me concerning what I added instead of giving me the stock hall monitor response. Using Ai to validate if my material is Ai is rich considering NO ONE engaged with me about the substance of what I added. UnnameableMedia (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help bro. --UnnameableMedia (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

How do I create an article? --ExperimentVR (talk) 21:10, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I would suggest reading Help:Your first article. Other essays you may find helpful are Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything and Wikipedia:Writing Wikipedia articles backward. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 21:27, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

What if the name of the article is mentioned on another article, does that help in the submission? --Lilian Zera (talk) 22:54, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! In general no, notability is only proven by multiple reliable sources which cover the subject in detail. However, appearing in an article can suggest notability, as it means at least one source mentioned the subject, and the source may go on to cover the subject in depth, contributing to notability. It can also be a good thread to pull on to start finding sources on an article. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 09:02, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For how far you've quickly come in these 8 months since you've joined Wikipedia is very impressive! Thank you for helping others and your contributions to rail transport-related articles too! Your work is greatly appreciated. Fortek67 (talk) 21:23, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I do my best to help out where I can. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 21:45, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I enjoy metal music (ie.Metallica Black Sabbath etc.) do you have any suggestions for simple edits? --MooMooMoo27 (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. I can't recommend any specific article, but you could try setting your homepage to show you edits from music-related articles, and then looking through until you find something in a topic area you like.
Once you're a bit more comfortable with adding content to articles, you could take a look at Category:Heavy metal music stubs for a list of metal-related articles that need expanding. You can also do a search using categories to find specific combinations, such as Heavy metal articles which need copy-editing.
For a more general list of tasks you can try, see the task centre. You can use that to find the category for a specific task, then do a search for pages both in that category and Category:Heavy metal music.
Hopefully you can find something! {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 14:10, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks:) MooMooMoo27 (talk) 16:39, 19 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sorry but I think a WP:BARTENDER's close would've been better here. AFAICT (not withstanding I'm involved) there's consensus for Rainmaking (ritual) --> Rainmaking, weak support for Rainmaking --> Pluviculture (pending a possible AfD), and then a closer's choice between the two options for Rain prayer Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 17:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's fair. I guess I weighed the arguments to delete the current article against the suggestions for moving to pluviculture, whereas in reality I suppose someone suggesting deletion is indifferent to the title of the article before it's deleted. The Rain prayer article wasn't discussed except for the one person who proposed the alternative, so it's hard to evaluate whether there's actual consensus there. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 21:02, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User talk:GearsDatapack and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Why am I not allowed to give my opinion --Hunterdavenport (talk) 20:18, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I'm not really sure what you mean. Could you elaborate? {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 20:31, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

why am I not allowed to write an opinion based on my experience Hunterdavenport (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you're talking about adding your opinion into Wikipedia articles, please see Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. If you want a place to publish your opinions, you probably want a social media website or a blog of some kind. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 07:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

that's dumb Hunterdavenport (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Alphabet run: Countries starting with I, J, K and L Article improvement campaign: Orphaned women Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Eiffel women Tip of the month: Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Good day! I can't figure out how to edit tables like the Chairperson section in the UP Diliman University Student Council page. --Whisperofcries (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Editing tables is one of the trickier things to do on Wikipedia; if you're using the visual editor, you can double click on a table cell to edit its content, or click on the arrow next to a row or column (after you've selected a cell within that row/column) to insert, move, or delete rows and columns. It may also be helpful to read Help:Introduction to tables with VisualEditor, or if you're using the source editor, Help:Introduction to tables with Wiki Markup. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 13:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You don't m ake sense --Inder578984 (talk) 18:35, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know, I'll keep that in mind. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 19:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can I make a page? --TerraByte2026 (talk) 13:35, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. Anyone can create a page, yes. For your first article, you'll need to go through articles for creation, where someone will review your article before it is published. I would suggest reading Help:Your first article to understand the process.

The basics is that you need to make sure your chosen subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, then create a draft using the article wizard. Once ready, press "Submit for review" and wait until your article is reviewed. Some helpful essays to read:

• Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything, a simplified explanation of the notability criteria
• Wikipedia:Writing Wikipedia articles backward, an essay on how to avoid a common mistake for first-time article writers

{{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 13:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

hello there hows you as a mentor? Lexter31 (talk) 11:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Looks like you've been reassigned to me as your previous mentor is inactive. I like to think I'm a reasonably good mentor; I try to answer questions as quickly and as helpfully as possible. There's only one way for you to find out though... {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 12:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but where's the consensus not to move? Three support and two oppose is hardly consensus to oppose! -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Consensus is not a vote. In the discussion I see one "Support" !vote that discusses pageview data, which is not really relevant to the discussion, and one which just says "per nom". On the other hand, the arguments against the move explain their position and cite policies to back up their arguments. To me, the arguments presented are enough to determine consensus. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 11:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm aware it's not a vote, but considering all parties have given rationales you seem to be employing a supervote here. Saying "per nom" just means I entirely agree with the nomination, which is a perfectly valid opinion and should not be discounted as you appear to have done. And I fail to see why Crouch's comment was not relevant. It was entirely relevant. It was pointing out that neither was more notable per pageviews and the disambiguation was insufficient as both are bands. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I didn't discount your argument, or that of the nominator or Crouch, Swale. From what I gathered:

• The arguments in favour of moving are that the two articles exist and have a similar number of pageviews.
• The arguments against moving are that there are already hatnotes in place, and that WP:NCBAND (which is an official guideline) dictates that these are to use separate disambiguators and that they are already sufficiently distinct.

I deemed that the latter argument was stronger (given that it was rooted in Wikipedia guidelines), so I closed it as not moved. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 12:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

hallo hoe werkt dit allemaal --"Magie1985" (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Firstly, I apologise but I don't speak Dutch so I'm going to ask that we converse in English. If you want to use Dutch, you're better off going to the Dutch Wikipedia. I can't explain everything about Wikipedia to you here, as there's a lot to learn. For an overview, you may want to see Help:Introduction. If you have a more specific question, feel free to ask me here, or at the Teahouse. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 22:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dear mentor: it took me only a few weeks before I encountered a potential editorial war. I do not want engage into, thus I am asking for your advice. The articcle in question is : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Pascal_Lottaz&action=history .

User Grapesurgeon moved page Pascal Lottaz to Draft:Pascal Lottaz without leaving a redirect: Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace. Reason/s: more sources needed .

Being used to the US legal system, I find such remark "arbitrary and capricious" (see Standard of review for definition). The number of cited sources is comparable to the numbers in the articles about other International Relations professors (e.g. Steven Walt). I do not want to start a fight with Grapesurgeon. I'd rather place this draft for a discussion. How can I do it? --ArcturusNotTaurus (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I don't really have time to look through the article, but I'll tell you some things that you can do. Firstly, the raw number of sources doesn't matter so much, it's more about the quality of the sources (i.e. are they reliable and independent?), and the extent to which they support the claims made in the article. Is if you have a shorter article, you'll generally need fewer sources. Wikipedia requires every claim to be backed up by a reliable source.

My suggested next steps for you are to either: message Grapesurgeon directly at User talk:grapesurgeon, and ask them to clarify exactly why they moved it back to draftspace, or submit it through articles for creation, where someone else will review it and decide whether it's ready for mainspace.

Hopefully that helps! Let me know if you have other questions. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 12:33, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Today is going be my first time with articles for creation. ArcturusNotTaurus (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Can I access my sandbox to start drafting an article before I edit 10 others? I want to start practising, and although I have verified my email, my username page isn't showing as ready yet. Thank you! --Sparklyamanda (talk) 15:09, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I don't think you can create pages until you are autoconfirmed, but you can either use the article wizard to create a draft in the Draft: namespace, or if you like I can create your sandbox for you, and you can edit it from there. I will say though, it will probably be easier to start writing a new article once you have a bit of experience editing existing ones, so consider trying some easier tasks before jumping straight into article writing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! thank you for your reply. I have watched quite a few tutorials and I feel confident enough to make a start on my article, but I will also practise editing. I would like it if you could create my sandbox for me please, I can make a start. It's about a person. I want to at least start it so I can work on it and also practise editing skills concurrently. Sparklyamanda (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay done! You can draft your article here. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 10:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

HI! I have tried to make a start, but the sandbox looks different to the tutorials I have been watching. The citation button doesn't have a drop down menu. I have just done the introduction so I can await further feedback. Also, how do I add photos? There are lot freely available on line and I know they need to be credited, but I'm not sure about this either as I can't claim ownership can I ? Or does it come under the creative commons on here? I downloaded one but I wasn't sure how to proceed. I would appreciate our advice!

Thank you Sparklyamanda (talk) 11:09, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, I'm not sure about the differences in the editing menu. As far as I know, userspace pages have the exact same editing interface as mainspace articles. Is it possible you were watching an old video from a previous Wikipedia interface? The design has changed somewhat over the years.

As for photos, you will need to upload them to Wikimedia Commons. If you are upload photos that you didn't take yourself, you need to make sure that they are released under a Creative Commons license (one which allows both commercial use and modification), or a similarly compatible license. The commons upload wizard guides you through the process. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 11:16, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh, it's also possible that you were using the source editor instead of the visual editor, which was likely used in the video. If that's the case, you need to find the little dropdown menu with a pencil icon in the to-right corner, and use that to switch to visual editing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 11:19, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You moved this, but one of the key !votes in support seems confused about whether the title of the article was Saint Olaf or Saint Olav. Makes a big difference for common name. Srnec (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Even with that confusion, I still don't see a strong enough argument against the move. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

thanks el.ziade (talkallam) 13:56, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Which page? I've tagged several in the last couple of hours. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 14:09, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fleur Leussink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleur Leussink until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

–Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi yes. I’m trying to add picture to mine page. Also how is the process first the sandbox draft ? And then? --TopGLatin (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! There's a good tutorial at Help:Pictures which guides you through how to add images to articles. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 18:53, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mentor: I have databases about many subjects hosted on EndNote platform. EndNote can create reference list in many [styles], but not in Wikipedia-style. They can create such style for free, but they need an official request from Wikipedia itself (not from me) to do this. Can you figure out a solution to this problem or get a Higher Authority to get involved into this project? --ArcturusNotTaurus (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'm just a volunteer editor like everyone else on this platform so I don't have any more authority than you. You can try to contact the Wikimedia Foundation, but won't necessarily get any useful results.
The Wikipedia visual editor allows automatic generation of Wikipedia citations and understands various different formats, so that's probably the easiest way to go about this. I believe BibTex is supported, though I'm not totally sure. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:14, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your reply. i contacted info@wikimedia.org. Let's see what happens. ArcturusNotTaurus (talk) 21:33, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

HI, I am happy with my article and I have published it in my sandbox. I am still doing other edits so that my 'Jordan Sangha' article can get published live more quickly. Can you advise me of my next step please? It is showing that I have made more than 10 edits on my home page, so I am not sure if / when / how I can move my article to another space to get it reviewed/ approved more quickly. I will continue to make other edits but can you tell me the fastest way to get my article live please? Thank you --Sparklyamanda (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! If you've submitted through AFC, there's not really anything to do but wait I'm afraid. If you're autoconfirmed then you can move the article to mainspace, but for your first article, especially if you don't have much prior editing experience, I would recommend waiting to get it reviewed by someone more experienced. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 20:48, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

What's AFC? I've created it in the sandbox and published it ... is that the right thing to do? Thank you ~2026-34973-91 (talk) 20:57, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh, it's articles for creation, the process by which new users submit articles to be published. If you have something sitting in your sandbox without submitting it for review, people won't touch it as it's generally considered polite not to touch userspace pages from other users (unless they're violating Wikipedia policy). {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:15, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok that's great. It's finished , and I pressed publish . So do I need to move it now? I thought publishing it meant others could see it.

if I move it, where am I moving it too? I don't want to lose it!

thank you

amanda ~2026-34973-91 (talk) 05:58, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are correct that others can see it - anyone can in fact - however, it's still a user page, which means it won't get indexed by search engines and can't be linked to by other articles in the encyclopedia. Once it's ready, you can move it to "mainspace", which is where proper articles live.

As to the title, it should be a minimal identification of the subject of the article. So for a person, it would be their name.

Please note, if you have a conflict of interest with the subject, you must disclose that and go through AFC, you can't publish it directly. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 07:00, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I do not have a conflict of interest with him so that's ok. So shall I just move it to the main space? Could you advise me how please? Sparklyamanda (talk) 17:15, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

To move an article, you go to the "Tools" menu, then select "Move", and enter the title you want to move to. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 17:23, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

that seems too easy! I'm scared!

so when I move it, is it live? and how do I edit it and add to it? I already have more information about his recent work.

When can I search for it on the main encyclopedia page and let people know it is there?

Thank you, I'm doing it now. I am happy with it, I just want it to be live now. Sparklyamanda (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Once you move it to mainspace, it's part of the encyclopedia. It needs to be reviewed by a new page reviewer to determine whether it meets Wikipedia's core content policies before it is indexed by search engines. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 17:41, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

oh thank you. I can see it has gone from my sandbox which is now a redirect page.

I got a message saying i need to clean up but I don't think I have to do anything ? I don't have a sort category on my page and I haven't changed anything on my sandbox links.

So presuming it meets the criteria, how long does the article take to get reviewed? I am hoping it does as I have sources and linked everything. Do I get a notification message or email or do I just need to keep checking in on wikipedia to see if it is there?

THank you Sparklyamanda (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You should get a notification when someone reviews it. There's no set timeframe, as reviewers don't review articles in any particular order. If no one reviews it for 90 days, it will automatically be considered reviewed. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 18:23, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, how long will it take for my article to get verified and get published? --Sparklyamanda (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

how to Pubish any post About Releted Topic and and Digtal Trend 2026 --AnkitkRathor (talk) 07:41, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, not really sure what you're asking there. Can you be more specific? {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 13:08, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "extendedmover" (Page movers) will expire on 00:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

ไม่เอาอะไร --Tomtan007x (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,so sometimes there are movies which go by a certain name in one language but when they get dubbed the name of the movie changes in the dubbed language as well.How do I write both and explain about them? --Erfanyx (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Usually you would put the English translated name in bold in the opening sentence, followed by brackets with the original name and language. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 13:19, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

For example, see Squid Game. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 13:20, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Biks is going to be delivered to the link below to get started my dear friend request for the link to the link below to register your account please send me your WhatsApp number so I can get 🥫 or something for you to send me your WhatsApp number please send me your WhatsApp number so I can get the money and send it to me please don't forget to pay me back when you get started my dear friend request for the link to join my WhatsApp group please. Thank you 6 --MonirAhamed 01714296703 (talk) 19:31, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am new to this site and do not have any idea to create my page. Please guide me to do so. Thank you. --Dr O. P. Sudrania Emeritus Professor (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you are considering writing a Wikipedia page about yourself, I would strongly advise against it. If you're planning to write an article about something else, you can use the article wizard. See Help:Your first article for more information. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 08:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

hello my question is how do I find something about horses body --2erererert (talk) 03:52, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you want to just find information that's already on Wikipedia, Horse § Anatomy is a good place to start. If you're wanting to add new information to Wikipedia, looking for papers on Google Scholar or books on Google Books is probably the best method, unless you have a local library or something where you can get physical materials. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 17:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Sangha (television personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to Big Brother (British TV series) series 20.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Sangha (television personality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Tacyarg (talk) 09:26, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Respected Sir,

Can you tell me about rulesand regulations about writing an article on wiki --Akshayjangra5897 (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. There are a lot of policies and guidelines regarding editing, too many to list here, but the main ones you need to know about are known as the core content policies, which are the bare minimum for articles. These are neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research.
If you follow those, as well as making sure to remain civil and assume good faith when interacting with other users on the wiki, you'll likely pick up the other rules about editing along the way. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 06:38, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GearsDatapacks. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red | July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377 Events: New: Crime & law | Alphabet run: Countries starting with M Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Women in Red celebrates its 11 Year Anniversary on July 18! Eiffel women Developing Countries WikiContest Tip of the month: Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box for the footer of those pages? Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--MSGJ (talk 22:13, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Heya, is there something Wikipedia editors usually use for library/newspaper-database access? I’m looking for contemporary coverage of a South Korean building collapse from the 90s, but a lot of archives are paywalled.

Also, is there anything you’d recommend for journal access given that Sci-hub kind of sucks now? I heard if you make 500 edits across 6 months you get access to the Wikipedia Library. Should I minmax edits with this goal in mind and save more ambitious research for later? What’s the culture/strat around this? Ty. --JeniPanic (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yeah the Wikipedia library is good once you reach the requirements, but until then you can use resource exchange to request access to materials from other volunteers who can access them. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 23:07, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

ছেলে: "জানো, তোমার হাসিটাই আমার দিনের সবচেয়ে সুন্দর মুহূর্ত।" মেয়ে: "আর তুমি... আমার পুরো পৃথিবী।" --Anawerislam (talk) 03:07, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I only speak English. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:03, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nhận thay đổi đăng tải thành viên nhận code --Dun1981 (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I only speak English. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:03, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

How long you have been editing all 6,000+ article? --MrFirsty (talk) 07:20, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I created my account in September 2025, but I only really started editing regularly from January this year. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 07:56, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Alright then, thanks for reply. MrFirsty (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello what kind of edits would you recommend for a new editor like me. --Judah Roby (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. I would suggest starting with the "Suggested edits" that can be found on your home page. There are different levels from easy to hard, and they guide you through the process of each type, helping you learn the basics of Wikipedia editing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 00:59, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unrelated question, but why is the 2019 nairobi dusitd2 attack article stylized like a article for a battle/war? --Johndaughter (talk) 12:31, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I have no idea. I've never touched that article before. Best bring it up on the article's talk page. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 16:06, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks for the confirmation. Johndaughter (talk) 10:10, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello there! This is my 3rd mentor right? Well... two of my mentors just left for a single reason. But anyways, how are you? Well... just kidding you are still my mentor, since grazie left me. Lexter31 (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a specific question about Wikipedia? {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 16:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

well, I'm just beginning editing pages but still a beginner since I created my account 1 year ago Lexter31 (talk) 16:35, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can I make a page about the Original Vol 2 Odd Future Tapes (2008)? It is only mentioned on other pages and doesn't have a standalone page itself. --Khosdude (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

As with any subject, you would need to ensure that it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. If you can find multiple reliable, independent sources which cover it in depth, then you can make an article. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 16:32, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, there! Thanks for being my mentor. On references, I have been changing "page" and "pages" to "p." and "pp.". Is this acceptable? --Adriene67 (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, although I have reverted your edit because Jean Lee (murderer) uses Australian English and dmy dates, not American. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 10:02, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Is there a way to determine which version of English to use for entries if not obvious (as with an American-, British-, Australian-originated article)? Adriene67 (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Use whichever one the article currently uses; don't change it without good reason. Most articles have a template at the beginning which tells you which variant to use, which is invisible to readers but should show up when you start editing. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 19:16, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks much. Adriene67 (talk) 19:19, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, GearsDatapacks. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole or hamster wheel, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the § Survey when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 03:15, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I had posed a question but discovered the answer, thanks!--Gatopretorockey (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mentor and everyone,

I’m new to this community and would appreciate some guidance. I have questions about Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons policy, particularly the privacy of non-public relatives and the treatment of unsupported personal information.

I would also welcome an independent review of the concerns I raised regarding the proposed deletion of the Lawrence Irving Wilde article. I am concerned that the discussion has moved beyond a neutral assessment of reliable sources and has not fully respected BLP principles. Some comments appear aimed at discrediting the artist and his family rather than constructively improving the article.

I would be grateful for guidance on how these privacy and conduct concerns should be addressed and I would appreciate guidance from my mentor or any experienced editor who sees this question. --MapleLeaf33 (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Can you point to the specific parts which you think violate policy? I've looked through the discussion and from what I can see, every comment only discusses sources, not anything beyond that relating to the subject or their family members. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 07:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Editors discussed the private name and former name of the subject’s mother;

another family member’>s deleted article;

alleged connections between family members and Wikipedia accounts;

claims of “family-wide” promotional editing;

birthplaces, name changes, and personal records involving the family. A BLP correction should not automatically trigger a notability investigation or become a reason to scrutinize an entire family. Notability may be reviewed separately, but the person reporting a privacy violation should not appear to be punished for raising it. The article should be assessed fairly on reliable sources, and ut is there , they are calming that not. There all google full info about him notability should not accessed when the BLP concerns are corrected independently. I noted that mother name there and his artist name Boguinia called birth name, now they called it former name but it be better for living person to be removed at all when he is changing his image. It can be some place in article if needed , but not in line with real life name. Artists has many names through lives. Those names are not listed in line with birth name. Not articles has and place of bitth and date of birth! That also could be removed. But not article. Just fixed BLP issues. Which I raised. MapleLeaf33 (talk) 07:58, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Where were those discussions? I didn't see any of that in the deletion discussion. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Zou do not see that they still mentioning and family member and name change as if they are vital record office ? Look better MapleLeaf33 (talk) 15:30, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but I can't help you if you don't provide enough information for me to help you. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:37, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fd nation is an Nigeria artist and music writer --Fdnation (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would strongly advise against writing a Wikipedia article about yourself. See WP:AUTOBIO {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 18:22, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Is there a way to find more specific articles I can edit? I am not an expert on sports, but I am in alpine skiing, and would love to help edit related articles! --J0bapplication821 (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You can look at Category:Alpine skiing for a list of articles covering it, and click through them (or use Special:RandomInCategory to find random pages) until you find one that you want to edit. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 21:24, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red | August 2026, Vol 12, Issue 8, Nos 358, 359, 378, 379, 380 Events: New: Alphabet run: Countries starting with N and O | Indigenous women | Women born before 1900 Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports More ... Announcements: On 25 July, at Wikimania Paris, Women in Red was named the Coolest Project! Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for a woman's status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk 21:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply