user talk:theleekycauldron
|
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 | 8 | ||||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
Inbox
[edit]| This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Sometimes messages slip through the cracks. Sorry about that! I keep this list to let me know what I still need to respond to – feel free to add your own name and message here if you're still looking for a response from me.
- 05:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC) fill out your thing at WP:REFLECTIONS – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
- 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC) ban houseblaster from my talk page for messing with the inbox format theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- 06:14, 26 January 2026 (UTC) amber
Two barnstars for you too!
[edit]
|
The DYK Barnstar | |
| If I deserve two barnstars, then I think you deserve at least as many! Thank you for your part in the gargantuan multi-hook set shenanigans, and for all of your help in getting DYK newbies such as myself settled in to the back end of the process. :) |
|
The DYK Barnstar | |
| (insert clever joke about two nickels) |
—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- @TechnoSquirrel69: You're the sweetest, thank you!! (I haven't quite figured out what mechanism would allow me to unilaterally ban House from my talk. working on it, though. maybe I can get myself declared a CTOP?) publeek (house · service · theleekycauldron) 01:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Did you know... that no BlasterOfHouses can show their face in publeek? (No worries if you'd like to ban me from your talk as well for that one.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I logged in to the alt for this. And had a good chuckle IRL :) BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 01:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Did you know... that no BlasterOfHouses can show their face in publeek? (No worries if you'd like to ban me from your talk as well for that one.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:13, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
insert clever joke about two nickels
If I had a nickel for every time somebody got two barnstars in one, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice, right?Now, if I had a nickel for all the barnstars given here. I'd have four nickels. That's a lot of nickels. – LuniZunie(talk) 01:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2026
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).
- Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.
- Voting in the 2026 Steward elections started on 06 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC) and will end on 27 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process for current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
DYK for ICE protest songs
[edit]On 14 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ICE protest songs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bruce Springsteen's ICE protest song, "Streets of Minneapolis", was written the day Alex Pretti was killed and performed live the same week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Streets of Minneapolis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, ICE protest songs), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
HurricaneZetaC 00:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
Planning help for AI workflows
[edit]I'm contacting users who signed up as participants of the Wikipedia:Help Project, about a discussion on brainstorming and choosing the first help page to draft on editing Wikipedia pages assisted by AI.
If you are interested, I'll see you at Wikipedia talk:Help Project#Planning help for AI workflows.
Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 11:46, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
WikiCup 2026 March newsletter
[edit]The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.
The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.
Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
Battle bot
[edit]Are you aware of the long-term edit war GalliumBot has been waging with itself and another bot? Every day, MusikBot adds a new date heading to WP:DYKN, correctly preceded by a blank line. Seven minutes later every day, your bot removes the blank line, and then eventually restores it. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'd be pinging Janelle Shane had she been a Wikipedian because this reads like a golden material for more ai weirdness. Especially the imagery. 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 05:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- I mean, GalliumBot doesn't incorporate any neural nets and has very little in the way of decision-making; I'd hesitate to call it an AI at all. That said, yeah, looking into it :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- In the same style of training tiny char-rnns with a small set of halloween costumes, maybe I can train something similar with the right formatting of diffs. maybe! 海盐沙冰 / aka irisChronomia / Talk 05:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- I mean, GalliumBot doesn't incorporate any neural nets and has very little in the way of decision-making; I'd hesitate to call it an AI at all. That said, yeah, looking into it :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

