SYNDICODE’s cover photo
SYNDICODE

SYNDICODE

IT Services and IT Consulting

San Francisco, California 2,180 followers

Software Engineering Solutions

About us

Syndicode is your value-driven software development partner with a globally distributed team of 70+ engineers, designers, architects and IT managers. We are united by the mission to provide our clients with software products and services that perform, look, and work as designed. With 10 years on the market, Syndicode delivered end-to-end software development, dedicated teams, staff augmentation and team extension services to 200+ businesses worldwide. This includes but is not limited to AI Products, B2B and B2C Digital Products, Marketplaces, Web applications, Mobile Apps, SaaS services, CRM Systems.

Website
https://syndicode.com
Industry
IT Services and IT Consulting
Company size
51-200 employees
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2014
Specialties
Custom Software Development, IT Outsourcing, Staff Augmentation, Dedicated Team, Web Development, Mobile Development, Marketplace Development, Ruby on Rails Development, LMS Development, SaaS Development, UI/UX Design, Product Design, Software Engineering, IT Consulting, and AI Development

Locations

Employees at SYNDICODE

Updates

  • View organization page for SYNDICODE

    2,180 followers

    Mykhailo Bryndzak is breaking down the engineering decisions that actually matter: chunking, OCR pipeline, hybrid search, citations. The parts tutorials skip because they're hard.

    I spent the last few months at SYNDICODE building a RAG system in production for one of our clients. Not a notebook demo. A real one — multi-tenant, used daily by domain experts, with answers that move money. I want to write up what I actually learned. The parts that were hard. The business problem the system solves is one I've seen in three different industries already: a team has thousands of pages of dense, scanned, table-heavy documents, and the answers their people need every day are buried inside. Today they search by hand. It takes hours. Sometimes they get it wrong, and a wrong answer is expensive. The economics are brutally simple: → A specialist who finds the right reference in 10 seconds instead of an hour bills the next project sooner. → A wrong number on a deliverable can mean a rework, a fine, or a failed audit. → Tribal knowledge stops walking out the door every time someone retires. The system I built lets users upload a PDF (or DOCX, or XLSX) and chat with it. Every answer cites the exact source page so a human can verify. It runs on cloud infra (managed Postgres with vector search, a small container service, object storage with direct browser-to-storage uploads), costs a few dollars a day per active user, and handles tables, OCR errors, and multi-turn conversation. Over the next few weeks I'll break down the parts that were actually hard, in roughly the order a request flows through the system: → upload that doesn't melt → table-aware chunking → OCR-aware pipeline → hybrid search with RRF → domain glossary, used twice → citations + page highlight → conversational rephrase → pgvector, not Pinecone → intent routing off the LLM → cross-doc dedup, same vectors If you're building anything that turns documents into answers — for legal, support, finance, healthcare, internal knowledge — these are the same problems you'll hit. I'd rather you hit them with the playbook. What's the most broken part of the standard RAG stack you've had to fix for production? #RAG #LLM #AIEngineering

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Before we built an AI report generator for Maxwell, we asked why the existing solution wasn't working. The answer was that getting to the data required manual effort that scaled with the number of questions you needed to answer. The AI component thus solved a specific bottleneck: turning a query into a relevant visualization without requiring someone to build the report manually. The output was verifiable. The failure mode was low-stakes. The time saved was immediate and measurable. That's the template we apply when evaluating whether AI belongs in a feature: specific bottleneck, verifiable output, recoverable failure mode. Full story: https://lnkd.in/ecKkXwei

  • When a new team has to re-learn a codebase, re-discover why decisions were made, re-map how systems connect 👉 that cost lands on the product. This is one of the reasons continuity in a development partnership has compounding value over time. The team that knows your system makes better decisions about it, faster, with less risk. It's also why the question to ask a potential partner isn't just "what's your rate?" but "how do you maintain continuity across a long engagement?" The cheapest development partner is rarely the cheapest development engagement. https://lnkd.in/eA8EtiS3

  • A few of the problems we've solved recently: ➡️ A mortgage platform losing time to manual reporting and outdated integrations ➡️ A construction company's institutional knowledge locked in files no one could search ➡️ A job marketplace slowed by technical debt accumulated during rapid growth If you're evaluating engineering partners for a product with real complexity, we're worth a conversation. Let's talk: https://lnkd.in/dbv2fpxZ

  • There's nothing worse than hearing "wait, is this actually what the user needed?" somewhere between done and live. By then, small tweaks have become blown deadlines and budgets.| The answer is BA at the start of every, even the smallest, project. It's the only way to find out what you're building before you've paid to build the wrong thing. 👉 Our approach: https://lnkd.in/gHP8T9E4

  • Building a medical e-learning platform in a regulated market means every feature decision carries compliance weight. MedYouCate needed a development partner who could move at product speed without creating regulatory risk. A dedicated team with shared context was the only model that made that possible. Over the engagement, the SYNDICODE team became an extension of the product organization: understanding the domain, anticipating constraints, and delivering without the overhead of constant re-onboarding. This is what sustainable platform development looks like for products that operate in high-stakes environments. 👉 Full case study: https://lnkd.in/eu_ZTWVe

  • Every vendor says they build "AI-ready" products. Here's what it actually requires: - Data that's structured, governed, and trustworthy enough to feed a model; - Architecture that can handle the latency and failure modes that AI components introduce; - Human approval layers where the stakes are too high for automated output; - Ability to explain to a compliance team what the AI does and doesn't decide. Most products aren't there yet, and many aren't being built toward it deliberately either. Getting there isn't a single sprint. It's a set of architectural and data decisions made consistently over time — ideally from the start, but recoverable if not.

    • Screenshot from vibeappscanner showing what happens when architecture, reliability, and failure modes are ignored:
No rate limiting → system collapses under load
No cost monitoring → business risk, not just technical failure.
  • Missing context = failing roadmaps. Especially in complex ones. When a product has multiple integrations, evolving requirements, and technical debt to manage alongside new feature work, consistent delivery depends on a team that understands why decisions were made, not just what was built. For growing platforms that can't sustain full internal engineering but need more than hired hands, a dedicated team model creates the continuity that makes delivery predictable ➡️ https://lnkd.in/gaaraqwJ

  • The most expensive problems in platform development live in the connections between systems. By the time the problem is visible: failed syncs, duplicated entries, loan applications that take twice as long to process, the cost of fixing it has compounded significantly. The earlier you treat integration architecture as a first-class concern, the less you pay later. Syndicode's data engineering practice is built around that principle. https://lnkd.in/dRwNgSSY

Similar pages

Browse jobs