Productboard’s cover photo
Productboard

Productboard

Software Development

San Francisco, California 96,567 followers

Make products that matter, together.

About us

Productboard is the intelligent product management platform that helps future-ready product teams deliver exceptional products with clarity and confidence. Over 6,000 companies, including Zoom, Salesforce, Medtronic, and more, use Productboard to uncover customer needs, drive strategic alignment, and rally everyone around the product strategy. With Productboard Spark, teams now have an AI agent purpose-built for product management—one that synthesizes customer insights at scale, accelerates evidence-based decisions, and builds organizational intelligence that grows smarter over time. Spark transforms how product teams work, turning scattered feedback into strategic clarity and helping teams ship what matters most. With offices in Prague and San Francisco, Productboard is backed by leading investors like Dragoneer Investment Group, Tiger Global Management, Index Ventures, Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia Capital, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Credo Ventures.

Website
https://www.productboard.com/
Industry
Software Development
Company size
201-500 employees
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2014
Specialties
Product Strategy, Product Marketing, User Experience, SaaS, Startup, Engineering, Software, Leadership , Technology, Product Management, Product Excellence, AI for Product, Strategic Planning, and Product Discovery

Products

Locations

Employees at Productboard

Updates

  • Productboard reposted this

    View organization page for Fin

    6,468 followers

    AI is making product teams faster, but it’s also making product decisions more consequential. At our recent Fin × Productboard meetup in San Francisco, Archana Agrawal (President, Intercom, building Fin) and Hubert Palan (Founder & CEO, Productboard) had an honest conversation on what great product craft looks like in the age of AI. The core theme throughout their conversation? When it becomes easier to ship, product craft is more about deeply understanding the customer problem, making trade-offs, and staying focused on what creates real value. A few ideas from the conversation stood out: → 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: Shipping faster only helps if you’re solving a real pain point. Product craft still starts with understanding the customer problem deeply. → 𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿: When you can build almost anything, focus and positioning become the moat. Teams need to be deliberate about what they won’t build, or the product starts to lose its shape. → 𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀: Many AI tools have similar looking chat interfaces. Increasingly the differentiation lies a level beneath, like in an agent’s domain expertise that enables more relevant responses and powers specialized workflows. We’ve pulled the full discussion into a  recap for anyone navigating product decisions in this new era. Read the full article below 👇

  • We keep treating team speed like it's just 5x individual speed. It's not. One person moving at 10x while four people wait for context? That's actually slower. Speed only compounds when your tools are built for collaboration, not just output. Find out for yourself: https://lnkd.in/gWXU_97m

    View profile for Patrick Zachar

    Staff Designer, AI & Productboard

    We keep getting this question: Why pay for Spark when a PM with Claude Code can DIY it? Totally fair. I’m seeing a lot of teams use Claude Code to move faster. It’s an amazing tool (I use it daily too 😅) and the mindset shift is real. But after watching this play out, one thing stands out: DIY works great for individuals. It breaks down at the team level. That’s why we built Spark. Not to replace tools like Claude, but to turn great AI outputs into shared, durable product artifacts teams can actually align around. The table below is the simplest way I’ve found to explain the difference. Curious how others are thinking about this. Are you seeing the same tradeoffs?

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Productboard

    96,567 followers

    Stop rebuilding context. You know the feeling: tab switching between tools. Copying feedback into an LLM. Re-explaining competitive intel to yet ANOTHER tool. Manually rebuilding the same product context. Again and again. What if you never left your working space? With Productboard Spark, PMs now have a specialized product agent that can bring together their scattered product data while helping them carry out their core product responsibilities. ✍️ Drafting a product brief? Pull feedback, roadmap context, and competitive analysis in one flow. One conversation. Full alignment. 🔎 Hunting for patterns in customer feedback? Surface opportunities and validate them against engagement metrics instantly. 🌎 Understanding your competitive landscape? Identify product gaps and learn why you may be losing users. With Spark, you're synthesizing context at scale, in one place. Use MCP connectors to query live data from tools like Amplitude, Linear, Pendo.io, Hex, Notion, and more via custom connectors. Use integrations to attach files from Confluence, Google Drive, and Notion to your Spark prompts and inform its outputs. Try Spark today → https://lnkd.in/drErv2zd

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Productboard reposted this

    View organization page for Fin

    6,468 followers

    “AI can help you build faster, but it can’t decide what deserves to exist.” That idea was key at our meetup last week in San Francisco, where we partnered with Productboard for a candid conversation on product craft in the age of AI. Our President, Archana Agrawal, sat down with Hubert Palan, Founder & CEO of Productboard, to explore how teams should think about building products to solve real customer problems. The throughline was clear: In a world where AI can draft PRDs, summarize feedback, and automate execution, speed is no longer the bottleneck. As AI makes it easier to build almost anything, product craft becomes the discipline of choosing what to build with focus and intention, and saying no to everything else. Thanks to Archana and Hubert for such an honest, insightful discussion, and to everyone who joined and pushed the conversation further with thoughtful questions. If you’d like to join a future Fin meetup, you can subscribe to our Luma calendar to see what’s next 👇

    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Productboard reposted this

    View profile for Ravi Mehta
    Ravi Mehta Ravi Mehta is an Influencer

    Users say they want AI to do tasks for them. That's not where the real value is. Jordan Nolff and the Productboard team just shared their lessons from building Spark, and one insight stood out: The real value isn't AI that completes tasks for users. It's AI that helps them think better. PMs don't need an agent to spit out a PRD. They need help thinking through customer needs, competitive alternatives, and business context. Other hard lessons from their journey: → They built the UI in 2 weeks, then spent 2 months iterating on AI quality. Most teams don't plan for this. → They started at 40% accuracy. Shipped at 85%. Ship early, and iterate with customers.  → Customers will accept 70-80% accuracy if they see you improving weekly. Perfection at launch matters less than visible progress. → Traditional estimation is broken. Frontend + backend ≠ done. AI quality is a third dimension nobody budgets for. The teams shipping great AI products aren't the ones with all the answers. They're the ones learning fastest from what didn't work. What's the biggest surprise you've encountered building AI products? Full article in the comments below 👇 #ProductManagement #AI #Startups #ProductDevelopment

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Productboard reposted this

    You can’t prompt your way out of bad context. 😬 Most “AI slop” isn’t obviously wrong. It’s generic. Plausible. Almost right. That’s what makes it so costly in product work. 🫣 When AI doesn’t have real product context, it guesses – pulling from patterns that work for someone, but not for your product. The result isn’t faster execution. It’s time lost validating, correcting, and debating outputs that feel real but aren’t grounded. The issue usually isn’t the model. And it’s rarely the prompt. It’s that product context is fragmented, personal, and manually reapplied – so AI never sees the full picture. 🖼️ Check out Productboard’s article on why AI slop is ultimately a context problem – and why PMs need to treat context like infrastructure, not a workaround. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/e6FvsHdM 💭 Curious how other product teams are handling this today. Comment below: What’s working – and what’s still painful? 👇 #AI #ProductManagement #Product

  • View organization page for Productboard

    96,567 followers

    Building AI products breaks all the normal rules. Jordan Nolff and our product team just wrote about what we learned building Spark on Ravi Mehta’s Substack — including the things that definitely didn't go according to plan and how we’ve evolved our approach. Turns out, there's a massive gap between "we can build this" and "this actually works well enough for customers to trust it." Some things that caught us off guard: → The timeline math is completely different. Build the UI in 2 weeks, spend 2 months on AI quality. Traditional project estimation doesn't work anymore. → Users lie to you (unintentionally). They'll tell you they want automation, but what they actually need is help thinking problems through. We had to reframe our entire approach. → 40% accuracy isn't the end, it's the beginning. The real question is: can you systematically get from 40% to 85%? We learned how (a labor of love). → You can't build for everyone at once. Early adopters will embrace imperfect AI. Your enterprise customers expect polish. For now, you have to pick one. Jordan shares his thoughts and brings together insights from Dominik Ilichman, Sr. AI PM for Spark, and our CEO Hubert Palan. Read it here → https://lnkd.in/dqt-_9qn

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages

Browse jobs

Funding