DeepSee.io - Publisher Intelligence’s cover photo
DeepSee.io - Publisher Intelligence

DeepSee.io - Publisher Intelligence

Technology, Information and Internet

We're a publisher intelligence company that helps you discover and target the best places to advertise on.

About us

We process millions of signals every day from hundreds of sources to generate comprehensive risk profiles for publishers and other advertising supply chain players. We use that information to intelligently interrogate sites and find the ones that produce exploitative behavior. Many existing risk detection solutions rely on personally identifying information (PII). As user and impression level tracking is becoming less reliable, agencies are looking for complementary datasets to close the gap left by these changes. Unlike click or impression trackers, DeepSee’s analytics are not predicated on collecting large amounts of data from web users. DeepSee looks at the nature of websites and their networks to discover places that harbor fraud. Where on-page trackers capture a point in time, DeepSee captures the journey, end-to-end, that a user might take.

Website
https://deepsee.io
Industry
Technology, Information and Internet
Company size
2-10 employees
Headquarters
Los Angeles
Type
Partnership

Employees at DeepSee.io - Publisher Intelligence

Locations

Updates

  • Most allowlists we audit have the same origin story. Someone exported a top-domains report years ago. A few sites got added because somebody asked. Then the file got copied into every campaign since. The problem is that the sites on it haven’t stood still. A domain is just a name. The business behind it can change completely while the URL stays the same. Sites get sold, and the new owner has different plans. Ad units get added until the page is more ads than article. Traffic gets bought to fill them. Writers get let go and the archive fills up with AI content. We flag thousands of new risk signals across domains each month. So a list that was solid at launch will have bad entries in it a few months later if nobody’s checking. We wrote up the full process, from SSP inventory reports to supply path checks to keeping the list current. Link in comments.

  • New DeepSee.io - Publisher Intelligence Updates: October Edition This month is all about apps. Here's what's new 👇 🔗 Network Tab for Apps App profiles now show the advertising identifiers we've seen in an app, and which other apps share them. Select any identifier to see every app using it and how many of those are high risk. 🔞 Clearer Adult Content Flags An 18+ age rating and explicit content aren't the same risk. We've split the adult signal in two for mobile and CTV apps, in both the portal and the API, so you can keep age-gated apps while excluding explicit ones. 📊 XLSX Exports With a Glossary Lists can now be exported as Excel files, with a glossary sheet that defines every signal and column. Share an export with a colleague or client without a separate explainer. 📱 New Research: Served, Not Seen We classified 212,344 utility apps across Google Play, Apple and Amazon. On Google Play, 90.8% of apps with no viewing session at all declare advertising, against 71.7% for the rest of the store. The less likely anyone is to see the ad, the more likely the app is to carry one. Check out our detailed October update linked in the comments! We'll be back next month with more.

  • Who's watching the ads on a lock screen app when the phone is in your pocket? Nobody (that's the whole problem). We sorted Google Play utility apps by whether a human is plausibly looking at the screen when an ad renders. The apps with no viewing session at all (lock screens, sleep sounds, live wallpapers) declare ad monetization at an enormously high rate: 90.8%. The less likely anyone is to see the ad, the more likely the app is to carry one. Wallpapers are the best example. The ad surface literally sits behind your icons. You can't optimize a wallpaper into the foreground of a foreground session, despite what IVT reporting might say. Some inventory just doesn’t make sense for ads. Exclude the category, don't bid “smarter�� into it. New report: “Served, Not Seen,” link in comments.

  • An app can sit at 4.6 stars and still have a review feed full of unclosable ads and forced installs. Our September update digs into that gap. The new Reviews tab shows what users are actually complaining about, backed by compliance tests for Android and iOS covering predatory loan offers, subscription dark patterns, undisclosed tracking, and more. Also shipping: an MCP server, so you can point an AI agent straight at DeepSee data without writing lines of integration code. Link to the full write up in the comments.

  • It will take years to fully untangle the psychological harm that AI companion & AI character apps are unleashing on vulnerable people (children and adults alike). Before it gets worse, let's come together to demand accountsbility by app marketplaces, and the platforms helping monetize them with programmatic ads.

    4,346 AI companion apps. 60% of them carry a rating that says a minor can use them. That's Teen or lower on Google Play, 12+ or lower on the App Store. We pulled store data on every AI character and companion app we could find: 1,464 on Google Play (~610 million combined downloads) and 2,882 on Apple's App Store. The age rating is one of the first signals a buyer leans on. It's on every listing, it's easy to read, and for most of the catalog it's a fine proxy. Mature 17+ means look closer. Everyone means relax. In this category it points the wrong way. 1,058 iOS apps, over a third of the entire set, are rated 4+, the band Apple reserves for content with "no objectionable material." That band includes apps literally named AI Boyfriend Chat – Husby and ChatBot My Virtual Girlfriend. On Google Play: HotChat – Your AI Soulmate, rated Teen, 5M downloads. Crave AI – AI Soulmate, rated Everyone, 5M downloads. Sexy Chatbot X – No Filter AI, rated Everyone, a million downloads. Meanwhile the family-safety company Aura, looking at the GenAI apps kids actually use, found the single biggest category of companion interaction is sexual or romantic roleplay at 36.4%. Homework help, the use case the platforms like to cite, is 13.1%. The rating says "general audience." The usage data says "romantic roleplay with a heavily teenage user base." Full breakdown in our new blog post (link in comments).

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • New DeepSee.io - Publisher Intelligence Platform Updates: July Edition We're back with another set of updates. Here's what's new this month 👇 💳 Manage Your Plan & Usage New self-serve Plans & Usage screen brings your plan, seats, and usage together in one place. Track lookups across web, apps, and CTV, monitor list exports and API credits, and manage everything directly from the portal. 🤖 New AI Content Compliance Tests We've added tests that measure how much of a site's text and imagery is AI-generated, flagging sites accordingly with new risk signals. 📱 Improved App Risk Signals Sharper detection for AI companion apps and utility-style apps, helping you spot low-quality, non brand safe and potentially fraudulent inventory faster. 📊 New Research: App & CTV Inventory Fresh research on what app and CTV inventory really looks like, and how to evaluate it. More on the way. 🧹 Bug Fixes & Polish A round of fixes and small improvements across the platform for a smoother day-to-day experience. Check out our detailed July update linked in the comments! We'll be back next month with more.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • If you’re buying on the open web right now, you’re probably asking some version of this question: What am I actually buying? Brand-safe inventory is scaling while fraud and AI slop run rampant. But reporting still looks fine. So how are you supposed to decide where spend goes? That’s why we created The Observed Web, a new DeepSee.io newsletter that tells you what’s really happening inside digital media supply. Every entry features insights, mini-analyses, and news roundups about supply health and quality. First up, we examine how AI-generated health content: Passes suitability checks Mimics medical authority Absorbs spend in high-trust environments ...while offering little accountability behind the scenes. If you care about signal quality and inventory integrity, and about protecting your performance over time, subscribe to The Observed Web today (link in comments)

  • Our CEO Rachmiel (Rocky) Moss publishing some interesting research on instream vs outstream video advertising

    I analyzed 60,000+ sites to understand how video ads are delivered on the open web. Something jumped out: a lot of what’s called “instream” actually isn’t. Many pages labeled as instream run autoplay videos that never had a chance to be watched. Some load multiple players at once, while others bury a silent player below the fold. The analysis leads me to believe that single-player pages perform best by every measure: longer watch time, higher engagement, cleaner ownership. In fact, those sorts of pages held users about 13% longer and opened with sound far more often than mislabeled autoplay units. If you buy video, it’s worth asking: how many of your “instream” impressions are actually being seen? Check out my full analysis in the comments.

Similar pages

Browse jobs