Psychodynamic therapy relies less on exercises and activities than most other types of therapy, but there are some very important tools in the psychodynamic toolbox that allow the therapist to delve deep into the unconscious mind with their clients.
The five tools and techniques below are common practice for many types of psychodynamic therapy.
1. Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM)
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, or DSM, is often referred to as the clinical psychologist’s Bible. The DSM serves as a framework for understanding and evaluating behavior within a therapeutic context.
Psychodynamic therapists and theorists sometimes critique the DSM’s focus on observable symptoms and omission of more subjective experiences as criteria for diagnosis.
To solve this problem of disagreement over diagnostic criteria, a Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (or PDM) was released in 2006 as an alternative or complement to the DSM. Those practicing psychodynamic therapy may find this manual to be more useful in diagnosing and treating their clients than the standard DSM.
2. Rorschach Inkblots
While these ambiguous and untidy splotches of ink are closely connected to Freudian psychoanalysis, they are also used in some forms of psychodynamic therapy today.
The Rorschach Inkblot test seems to be a particularly misunderstood tool in the general population.
Pop culture has made the test out to be either an end-all, be-all test of an individual’s personality, unique psychology, and predictor of all manner of mental health maladies, or a useless exercise in naming unnamable shapes.
In fact, the Rorschach test is neither of these things. It cannot illuminate your entire childhood experience, but it is also not a useless bit of trivia from a psychological era gone by.
The original Rorschach inkblots were developed in the early 1900s by psychologist Hermann Rorschach (Framingham, 2016). At the time, a popular game called Blotto involved a set of inkblots that could be organized into a poem or story or used in a round of charades.
Rorschach noticed that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia reacted differently to these inkblots, and began studying their use as a tool for diagnosis and discussion of symptoms.
His work resulted in a set of 10 inkblot images that can be presented to a client with the intention of observing and projecting based on their reactions to the images.
To conduct the Rorschach test, the therapist will present each inkblot to the client individually and ask the client to describe what they see. They are free to use the image as a whole, a piece of the image, or even the blank space surrounding the image to form an interpretation.
The therapist will take notes on the client’s descriptions and how they interpret the image. They may also ask additional questions to get the client to elaborate on what they see.
While there is controversy over how valid and reliable the results of this test should be considered, many therapists find that they provide valuable qualitative information about how the client is feeling and how they think (Cherry, 2017). It has also been found to be somewhat effective in the diagnosis of thinking disorders (such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder).
Those with these types of disorders tend to see and interpret the images differently than those without such diagnoses.
The important part of this test is the process of interpretation and description undertaken by the client, rather than any specific content seen in the inkblots. As such, the use of this test requires a highly trained professional to conduct, score, and interpret.
To see an online version of this test based on the work of researcher Harrower-Erickson, click here.
3. Freudian Slip
This may be the least formal (and perhaps least applied) technique in psychodynamic therapy, but it is certainly not a dead concept yet.
A “Freudian slip” is also known as a slip of the tongue or, more formally, parapraxes. These slips refer to instances when we mean to say one thing but accidentally let “slip” another, specifically when deeper meaning can be attributed to this slip.
For example, you might call it a Freudian slip when someone intends to say “That is your best idea yet!” but accidentally says “That is your breast idea yet!” You may assume that this individual has a certain anatomical feature in mind, or associates the person they are addressing with said feature.
Another example could be when you are feeling frazzled or overwhelmed at work and your boss pops by for a quick discussion. You aren’t really paying attention, and you absentmindedly say “Thanks Mom” instead of using your boss’ name. A psychoanalyst may consider this slip and decide that you have unresolved issues with your mother and that you are trying to fill the void of that parental relationship with your boss.
Freud (and some subsequent psychodynamic theorists) believed that these “accidental” slips of the tongue are not truly accidental, but actually reveal something meaningful about you. The Freudian theory holds that no behavior is accidental or random; rather, every move you make and every word you say are determined by your mind (conscious, subconscious, or unconscious) and your circumstances.
A psychodynamic therapist may pay special attention to any such slips, whether they occur in session or are simply related by the client during a session, and find meaning in the word substitution. They may conclude that a slip is actually a little piece of your unconscious finding its way to the surface, indicating an unmet desire or unknown association between two concepts.
While most modern psychologists agree that Freudian slips are generally just “slips,” it’s hard to argue that a slip of the tongue can’t occasionally reveal an interesting connection in the speaker’s mind.
4. Free Association
Free association may be the single most important and most used tool for psychodynamic therapists. This technique is simple and often effective.
In the context of psychodynamic therapy, there are two meanings attached to “free association:” the more official therapy technique of free association, and the general method of in-session discussion driven by the client’s free association between topics.
The more formal technique involves the therapist reading a list of words and the client responding immediately with the first word that comes to mind. This exercise can shed light on some of the associations and connections the client has hidden deep below the surface.
This technique may not be as useful to a client who is resistant to the exercise or to sharing intimate details with the therapist. However, therapists should not assume that a client who pauses before responding is resistant—it may indicate that the client is getting closer to a repressed or highly significant connection.
Free association may provoke an especially intense or vivid memory of a traumatic event, called an abreaction. This can be extremely distressing for the client, but it can also lead to a healing experience of catharsis if the client feels like it helped them work through a significant problem (McLeod, 2014).
The less formal concept of free association is simply the tendency to allow the client to lead the discussion in psychodynamic therapy sessions. This kind of relaxed, non-structured approach to dialogue in therapy is a hallmark of psychodynamics.
Practicing this type of informal free association ensures that the therapist is not leading the client anywhere in particular and that the client is moving authentically from one subject to the next. This is critical in psychodynamic therapy, as it is unlikely to reach the unconscious sources of psychological distress without following the client’s lead.
5. Dream Analysis
Another vestige of Freudian therapy, this highly subjective technique can prove useful for some, although its efficacy as a treatment technique is not proven via the scientific method.
However, the effectiveness of therapy cannot always be measured and codified by double-blind random control trials (RCTs), the gold standard of research.
Sometimes it is nearly impossible to determine which components or modes of treatment brought about success in therapy.
It is in this ambiguous environment that some of those not-quite-established techniques can contribute to real progress for the client. While dream analysis cannot be formally recommended as a reliable and effective tool, it is unlikely to cause any harm and should, therefore, be left up to the client and therapist whether to include it in the treatment regimen.
Dream analysis is undertaken by discussing the client’s dreams in detail. The therapist will guide the client through this discussion, asking questions and prodding the client to remember and describe the dream in as much detail as possible.
While the client talks about their dream, the therapist will attempt to aid the client in sorting the “manifest” content from “latent” content. The manifest content is what the client remembers about their dream—what happened, who was there, how it felt, the physical and temporal environment of the dream, etc. The latent content is what is beneath the surface of the dream, and this is where the meaning of the dream lies
(McLeod, 2014).
While Freud would nearly always find a repressed sexual urge or sex-related significance in the latent content, today’s dream interpreters have broadened their scope of meaning.

There are nearly countless ways that therapists, coaches, counselors, and practitioners of the more mystical arts engage in dream analysis, none of which have been identified as more effective or useful than the others.
However, one popular method of analyzing dreams comes from psychologist and author Dr. Patrick McNamara. His theory of the dreaming process can be explored on an individual level, allowing the client to attempt to sort through their own dreams to find meaning.
McNamara’s proposed process of dreaming is as follows:
- Step One:
The dreamer disentangles their consciousness from executive control/personal agency. In other words, the dreamer de-identifies with their usual self and sets up a “liminal state”—a state in which the dreamer is prepared to explore a new identity.
- Step Two:
The dreamer moves into this liminal space, opening him- or herself up to a world of possibilities in regards to their identity. This step is like taking off your usual “mask” and set it aside in anticipation of finding a new mask.
- Step Three:
This step typically occupies the most time and material of the dream, in which the dreamer “tries on” a new identity. The dreamer may be experiencing fear or anxiety associated with shedding their identity, and he or she may seek to reestablish a sense of control by searching for another identity or alternate sense of self.
- Step Four:
The dreamer finds a new, altered identity or resumes their old identity. McNamara believes we are searching for a more unified sense of self, but that we often find an identity that includes aspects of our darker side (McNamara, 2017).
These steps are tied into four literary tropes that some believe we use to make sense of the narratives we encounter and experience: metonymy (breaking up the pieces of a narrative), synecdoche (reorganizing those pieces into a new whole), metaphor (comparison of the pieces or the whole with something familiar), and irony (reflection of the new whole).
Using these tools for understanding narrative, McNamara suggests we can apply this process and the literary tropes to parse the meaning of any dream or dream sequence (2017). Of course, this technique has not been proven through scientific research, but you may find it helpful nonetheless.
For more information on McNamara’s system for dream interpretation, click here.
What our readers think
This is very informative and direct to understand. I find this very useful.
Interesting article. Bears little resemblance to how I trained in psychodynamic therapy, which focused on a much more relational approach which developed after Freud, particularly in Britain. I guess that shows the diversity within psychodynamic approaches. These days, attachment theory and neuroscience provide a lot of evidence for some of the key principles regarding the role of the unconscious and the importance of childhood experiences.
There is no one side fits it all kind of intervention. Each case seem to be looked into uniqely
really useful
Very insightful
Thanks a lot for the information. Its very informative and well explained. Kudos to the team and keep it up. God bless you
I tried psychodynamic therapy and have absolutely no clue what was supposed to happen. I asked the one I hired but she was useless. The whole experience was frustrating and useless and I am worse off for having tried it.
I found the lack of feedback and lack of direction from my therapist not helpful in resolving my issues
Hi, do you have the reference list for this article? very interesting thank you!
Hi Annie,
If you scroll to the very end of the article, you will find a button that you can click to reveal the reference list.
Hope this helps!
– Nicole | Community Manager
Hi there,
Many thanks for describing , with clarity , what is psychodynamic therapy. I have just started sessions with a psychodynamic therapist..only had two sessions so far…but I don’t feel comfortable in the sessions as I sense a lack of empathy and warmth. For example , having established that I had a traumatic childhood and as a result have issues of self-esteem and feelings of ‘not being good enough’ I found it very odd that I was asked certain questions. For example, ‘but your father didn’t care about you, did he? He didn’t care about your education, did he? He only wanted you to work so you could pay for his drink, right? You are very defensive, are you like that with friends? Do you have any friends?
The truth is my father was an alcoholic who had his own issues ( prisoner of war, lost his own father very young) and subsequently was unable to meet my emotional needs. But when he was not drinking he was kind and not a horrid man, if somewhat detached. I have many friends all over the world ,some from 50 years ago! I am popular and make friends easily. So I couldn’t see what the therapist was driving at. Was she trying to make me revisit old wounds? Was this intended to be cathartic? A long time ago I came to terms with my father’s behaviour. I’m a practising Buddhist and as such I see him just living his life , living out his own karma and I just got caught up in the crossfire of his angry struggle with life. As a Buddhist, we also believe that one should never disparage one’s parents. So I found her ( therapist) tone and comments offensive and hurtful.
We have an agreement whereby we give a months notice but I really feel that if I feel so unhappy at this stage, I have to ask myself, what can be accomplished in 3 or 4 more sessions? She will be better off financially but I can’t see how I will be any happier or clearer on emotional issues.
Any advice would be welcome.
With many thanks and best wishes, Jean
‘
Hi Jean,
Psychodynamic is a modern type of psychoanalytic theory. But I will answer to your dilemma with your therapist. I would recommend being honest with your therapist. Share what you felt about those questions, and everything you said here. No one can tell you when to stop the therapy but yes openly sharing your concern will help you make the further decision.
I hope it helps.
Thank you so much for such a great article. I am currently studying a MA in Social Work in the UK. Would you mind posting the Gad, 2017 reference please? I am working on a paper and this would be very helpful. Unfortunately, this reference was not included in the reference list?
Many thanks
Amanda
Thanks for the great article. I’m working on a reaserch paper and would love to quote Gad, 2017. was hoping you could please post it, thanks!
HI did you ever get the GAD reference?
Hi Amanda, Shimon, & Barry,
Our editing team has just taken a look at this, and we believe that citation was a typo. Apologies for the mistake! We have now replaced these with alternative references (you can find full details of the sources in the reference list).
– Nicole | Community Manager
Thanks so much for got my point to stand on
The information was very useful.