Consistency: use "touchscreen" rather than "touch screen" (Non-normative)#5037
Open
patrickhlauke wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
Open
Consistency: use "touchscreen" rather than "touch screen" (Non-normative)#5037patrickhlauke wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
patrickhlauke wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
single word is more common in the wild, and used more often in WCAG and its documentation than the two-word variant
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
bruce-usab
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2026
patrickhlauke
added
Techniques
Non-Normative
patrickhlauke
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
single word is more common in the wild, and used more often in WCAG and its documentation than the two-word variant
noticed as part of work on #4843
there is also a single instance in the normative definition for single pointer. will file a separate editorial erratum PR for that (see #5038)