Skip to content

Fix: changing diff fg color for better readability (#85) - #103

Merged
tomasiser merged 1 commit into
tomasiser:masterfrom
saccarosium:diff-color
Aug 2, 2022
Merged

Fix: changing diff fg color for better readability (#85)#103
tomasiser merged 1 commit into
tomasiser:masterfrom
saccarosium:diff-color

Conversation

@saccarosium

@saccarosium saccarosium commented Jul 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As mentioned in #85 the current diff fg colors makes really hard to read the text.

before
Screenshot 2022-07-08 at 08 10 17

after
Screenshot 2022-07-08 at 08 09 57

@tomasiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hi! Thanks a lot for this PR! To me, this looks like this fixes the situation for git. However, in all other cases (like a C++ or JavaScript file), it will also overwrite the front color to white. Do you think this is a good idea?

@saccarosium

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

However, in all other cases (like a C++ or JavaScript file), it will also overwrite the front color to white.

Sorry I don't really know what cases you are referring to. As far as I know this color groups should be specific to vim-diff and git diffs.

@tomasiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ah, sorry, I was living under the impression that the diff view should also retain the front color from the syntax highlighting of that programming language. I am merging this PR! Thank you very much!

@tomasiser tomasiser closed this Aug 2, 2022
@tomasiser tomasiser reopened this Aug 2, 2022
@tomasiser
tomasiser merged commit 21c23c8 into tomasiser:master Aug 2, 2022
pixelcmtd added a commit to pixelcmtd/vim-pitch-black that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2022
pixelcmtd added a commit to pixelcmtd/vim-pitch-black that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2022
@saccarosium
saccarosium deleted the diff-color branch August 5, 2022 18:12
@saccarosium saccarosium mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants