fix: export SwitchProps

[claudvanbarret]

ref #57

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0f2fabd) to head (6f29a4d).
⚠️ Report is 51 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #56   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           24        24           
  Branches         5         5           
=========================================
  Hits            24        24           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nrps9909]

Current master still has the unexported SwitchProps, but this 2020 branch is now conflicting and more than 50 commits behind the implementation. I opened #181 as a current-master, signed successor with a compile-time consumer regression plus full TypeScript/runtime/build validation. To avoid maintaining duplicate candidates, this older PR can be closed as superseded by #181.

[nrps9909]

This PR is now superseded by #181.

I revalidated the original request on current master: importing SwitchProps as a named type fails with TS2614, so the issue remains real. #181 applies the same one-line public export to the current implementation, adds a compile-time consumer regression (including onChange inference), and verifies TypeScript, all 14 runtime tests, ESM/CJS/declaration compilation, formatting, and generated declaration output. Its signed exact head is c0751a95bf58ce06d5fc06fb2e4837c0c3da243f.

This 2020 branch is conflicting and has no regression coverage, so closing it in favor of the current-base, tested implementation would avoid duplicate maintenance work while preserving the original contributor's issue context.

AI assistance disclosure: Codex was used to compare the two diffs and current repository state and draft this note. I verified the cited head and validation evidence before posting.