Skip to content

Update dependency requests to v2.34.2 - #45

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/requests-2.x
Open

Update dependency requests to v2.34.2#45
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/requests-2.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
requests (changelog) ==2.34.0==2.34.2 age confidence

Release Notes

psf/requests (requests)

v2.34.2

Compare Source

  • Moved headers input type back to Mapping to avoid invariance issues
    with MutableMapping and inferred dict types. Users calling
    Request.headers.update() may need to narrow typing in their code. (#​7441)

v2.34.1

Compare Source

Bugfixes

  • Widened json input type from dict and list to Mapping
    and Sequence. (#​7436)
  • Changed headers input type to MutableMapping and removed None from
    Request.headers typing to improve handling for users. (#​7431)
  • Response.reason moved from str | None to str to improve handling
    for users. (#​7437)
  • Fixed a bug where some bodies with custom __getattr__ implementations
    weren't being properly detected as Iterables. (#​7433)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency requests to v2.34.1 May 14, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/requests-2.x branch from 17f8ee2 to f57b1cc Compare May 14, 2026 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

0 participants