User talk:Willthacheerleader18

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on William Mack Lee. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the interesting biography, appropriately supported by modern and contemporary references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Josephine McDonald Yarbrough. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources to establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 14:15, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Ellen Armstrong Weaver. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for you work on this article. Please show a bit more coverage in secondary sources to establish notability per WP:BIO. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Lady Eliza Spencer. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:12, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you!! :) -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:22, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 December 21 § Eastern Orthodox church buildings on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - regarding the recent WIR template removals by @Odanr that you've reverted, you might wish to chime in on this recent discussion. Funcrunch (talk) 23:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Please be careful with creating WP:EGRS categories. I don't see much sourcing for these categories. Please be careful, because Meghan,_Duchess_of_Sussex [1] isn't British nobility. ^SMason_Garrison 02:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Betty Lou Ward. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this focussed biography of a long-serving commissioner, whose work was recognized with prizes. It's clearly written and structured.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 01:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Lu Long Ogburn Medlin. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article! Your efforts and work were greatly appreciated! Have a blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 23:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for registering for Wikipedia’s 25th birthday party! We can’t wait to celebrate with you next week. https://w.wiki/HPGi

The party will stream on the Foundation website in six languages - Arabic, Chinese, French, English, Portuguese and Spanish. We encourage you to join the party there! https://wikimediafoundation.org/wikipedia25/birthday-celebration

You also have the option of streaming on Wikipedia’s YouTube channel, though that channel will be only available in English. https://www.youtube.com/live/C5rPmv27YzY

Both channels will have a chat and lots of opportunities to participate live. Come ready to win some prizes!

See you there!

Chris Koerner (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mally Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mally Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 20:56, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Get ready to join Wikipedia’s 25th birthday party at 16:00 UTC, or come a bit early and get warmed up at the pre-party countdown starting at 15:45 UTC!

You can tune in on the Wikimedia Foundation website, where the party will be available in six languages – Arabic, Chinese, French, English, Portuguese and Spanish. https://wikimediafoundation.org/wikipedia25/birthday-celebration

You also have the option of streaming on Wikipedia’s YouTube channel, though that channel will be only available in English. https://www.youtube.com/live/C5rPmv27YzY

See you soon!

You received this message because you registered for Wikipedia’s 25th birthday celebration. https://w.wiki/HPGi

Chris Koerner (WMF) (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted who attended her funeral but did not delete who attended her wedding...<eyeroll>. She was not legally a princess as her title was not formally recognised in any state, her ancestors were. Kowalmistrz (talk) 09:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

His wife Mia Rohla is a great-great-granddaughter of Richard Strauss over her mother Madeleine. Was mentioned many times in newspapers and also in Wikipedia about her father Martin Rohla und the german Wikipedia article about August Wittgenstein.;-) https://www.ok-magazin.de/people/august-wittgenstein-alle-infos-zu-seiner-ehefrau-mia-rohla-107653.html https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Rohla https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_Wittgenstein ~2026-45763-0 (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:First ladies and gentlemen of Las Vegas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parker West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ingratis (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on Prominent individuals mentioned in the Epstein files. Bearian (talk) 08:52, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: Thank you so much! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm specifically concerned about WP:AVOIDVICTIM. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:09, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion has been declined. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:10, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that the page "attacks, threatens or disparages" the subject. Notability as an individual may be in question per BLP1E but the page is sympathetic if anything. AusLondonder (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. I didn't think of it as attacking, but I swore I remembered having articles speedied for undue victimization previously. I had declined such nominations, then swear I was told it was a legitimate use. Anyway, I specifically wanted another administrator to look at it, which is why I didn't automatically delete. The nomination has been reverted, and I've nominated for deletion at AfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: Excuse me? I did not create an "attack page" nor did I threaten anyone. I also did not contest the speedy deletion. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Willthacheerleader18! As you'll notice in my response to AusLondonder, I did not think the article was an attack page. However, it primarily focuses on the subject as a victim, which is against WP:AVOIDVICTIM. The speedy deletion was quickly reverted, and I brought the article to AfD instead. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:32, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@AusLondonder: Thank you for speaking up for me. The accusation of my making an attack page is ridiculous. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I just saw the template and thought that it was a bit accusatory. Even if people have concerns regarding notability etc it wasn't created as a bad-faith attack page. AusLondonder (talk) 04:45, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your edits to Wikipedia. I wanted to follow up about an edit where, Category:Liechtenstein women economistsLiechtenstein women economists was removed from a parent category.

This category is part of a group that falls under WP:EGRS, which covers categories based on ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, or disability. These categories are typically set up as non-diffusing. That means when a page is added to a subcategory like this one, it's still meant to be included in the parent category as well.

This is important because removing someone from the parent category can unintentionally change who appears to "belong" there. Over time, that can make the main category look less representative than it actually is, which the EGRS guideline is designed to avoid.

If you're not sure whether a subcategory is non-diffusing, you can often check the category page itself; many include a note or template. You can also read more at WP:EGRS and in the section on the final-rung rule. If you need further help, ask at the Teahouse. Thanks again for contributing, and I hope this helps clarify things! ^SMason_Garrison 04:32, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ava Cordero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Cordero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musette Steck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musette Steck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:03, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for adding these. *Normally* on wikipedia a blog would not be considered an appropriate source, *BUT* she is an expert in the field, so it is just fine. One day I'll have to go back through the wikipedia website and see how many dozen articles we have sourced to her blog.

I do have one request. For both those you are adding and those you have added before, could you use please use the following instead:

<ref>{{cite web |last= Becque|first= Fran|date= 4 February 2026|title= Fraternity and Sorority Members Competing in the 2026 Winter Olympics|url= https://www.franbecque.com/fraternity-and-sorority-members-competing-in-the-2026-winter-olympics/|website= Fraternity History & More|location= |publisher= |access-date= 9 February 2026}}</ref>

When Fran goes on to the next wonderful post, that new one will be at the top of her site. With the addition of the rest of the URL, it will always be able to be reached regardless of how much else she does.

Also, if you'd like to stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities, we'll be happy to see you there.Naraht (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]