User talk:Nighfidelity

Hello, Nighfidelity! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 06:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roadrunner (Chi-Ali song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening^(talk) 17:19, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nighfidelity! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening(talk) 17:19, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nightfidelity — thank you for taking the time to review the draft.

I’ve revised the article to more clearly demonstrate notability in line with WP:BOOK and WP:GNG. In particular, the Reception section now explicitly frames coverage in The Wire, Mojo, and Wax Poetics as independent reviews, including evaluative commentary rather than descriptive mentions.

I’ve also added additional independent editorial context (outside the Reception section) to clarify how the book has been referenced by third-party publications beyond publisher or interview material.

I hope these changes address the concerns you raised, but I’d be grateful for any further guidance if there’s something specific you feel is still missing. Thanks again for your time and feedback. DizzyKode (talk) 11:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tailspin Headwhack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:49, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Church of Rhythm at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:29, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sin Límite (Ednita Nazario album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black Menace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nil🥝 05:18, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yasuyoshi Kato, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:51, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cool Summer Reggae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sting.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Nighfidelity! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yasuyoshi Kato, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Japanese businessman Yasuyoshi Kato used embezzled funds to support his wife, who bought twenty Arabian horses, several emus, llamas, potbellied pigs, miniature cattle, and nurse sharks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yasuyoshi Kato. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yasuyoshi Kato), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Recipients of gubernatorial pardons in Washington indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm making an article on Clarence Boggie, a lumberjack pardoned in that state. That's why I created the category. Nighfidelity (talk) 22:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clarence Boggie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Professional Gamers League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MTE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Nighfidelity for collecting more than 13 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV25 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 6,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nighfidelity! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Harvey Kochel, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nighfidelity! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Kilshaw scandal?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Typhoon Aere (2004), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Okinawa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nighfidelity. Thank you for your work on LiveAbout. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clarence Boggie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oregon lumberjack Clarence Boggie had been convicted and pardoned twice for robbery before being charged with murder in 1935? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clarence Boggie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clarence Boggie), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nighfidelity,

I recently submitted an article for Wikipedia titled Alibaba.com and not only was it rejected but you indicated it can not be resubmitted? What is the reason for that? Also I actually did not use AI to write it so unsure why you have referred to it as AI slop? Readingcues (talk) 04:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the sources used in this article are promotional websites with dubious reliability and/or signs of AI writing (Alibaba Seller Central, AI Business, etc.) While there are also a collection of reliable sources, this article, those would be better included in the main page at Alibaba Group. Nighfidelity (talk) 04:54, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the clarification. Yes when I went back and read your feedback I see that your comment in regards to AI slop was referring to the sources not the article itself. Point taken, I actually used the Alibaba one as primary sources for some information and it never occurred to me that that it could be written by an LLM, but it brings forth an important point that I clearly understand now. I will change these sources and check all the rest for any content that has been written by an LLM. Readingcues (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: The reason why I created a separate page for Alibaba.com is because there are separate pages for AliExpress, Taobao, AliPay etc. Why would Alibaba.com not get its own page since it is a separate business entity similar to the ones I mentioned above? Readingcues (talk) 05:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the notice to allow other reviewers to give their opinion. Nighfidelity (talk) 04:57, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, really appreciate that! Readingcues (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Gloria (1996), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Reece, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 03:33, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nighfidelity. Thank you for your work on Lloyd Reece. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:MUSICBIO. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In opinion, he passes WP:MUSICBIO per criteria 9 and 11. Additionally, he has received coverage by the Jamaica Gleaner, which is considered a newspaper of record for Jamaica. Nighfidelity (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nighfidelity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:La Flavour, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Bliven, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~2026-93209-5 (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Halo, I am inquiring about Draft:MK International School ~2026-93209-5 (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

From a quick glance, it might pass WP:NSCHOOL, but I wouldn't accept it as it needs some tone changes. Nighfidelity (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hendrik Meurkens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nighfidelity! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Michael Kojima, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nighfidelity. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Baseball at the 2028 Summer Olympics is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Baseball at the 2028 Summer Olympics will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Gennady Danilenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, inquiring a review on this, it’s been pending for over a month and I believe it’s now notable. Regards. ~2026-12034-16 (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll accept this. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Nighfidelity (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know a lot of editors maybe never heard of Pure Fishing but it's literally the biggest fishing tackles company at least in the Western World. You say it's probably notable despite it's well covered in Bloomberg, but the reason you reject it is because majority of sources are connected to it? Like which one? I can't find a single one that isn't independent of the company? JaredMcKenzie (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, although it would pass WP:NCORP, the vast majority of sources won't contribute to notability.

• Ref 1 is from Moody's talking about how they upgraded the company's rating (a primary source)
• Refs 2 and 3 are company profiles, which are also primary
• Ref 4, the Des Moines Register article, mainly covers its founder Berkley Bedell, as he was a prominent politican
• Ref 5 is from an investment bank
• Refs 6 and 7 are from market growth companies (primary sources)
• Refs 8 and 10 are reliable, in my opinion. (one is from MarketWatch and the other is from Reuters)
• Ref 9 is a duplicate of Ref 1
• Ref 11 is from Pure Fishing's parent company
• Refs 12 and 13 are Bloomberg articles (generally reliable according to WP:BLOOMBERG)
• Refs 14, 15, 16, and 20 cover Bedell primarily
• Refs 17 and 18 don't cover the company primarily
• Ref 19 is from a zine, so I'm not sure of its reliabilty
• Refs 21 and 23 are reliable as they are from Reuters and FT.
• Ref 22 is from a fishing company
• Refs 24 to 33 are routine coverage of the company
• Ref 34 is a duplicate of Ref 13
• Refs 35 and 37 is somewhat reliable
• Ref 36 is from a financial market company, and so shouldn't be used
• Ref 38 is an interview and should be considered as primary
• Refs 39 to 40 are reliable as they are from trusted newspapers (The Guardian piece especially)
• Refs 41, 45, 46, and 47 are reviews of one of their products
• Ref 42 to 44 are routine company coverage
• Refs 48 to 54 are coverage of them winning the ICAST award (not sure how reputable it is due to the fact that coverage is limited to fishing news)
• Refs 55 to 56 are reliable
• Refs 57 to 61 only mention the company somewhat

If you can substitute the primary coverage with secondary sources (they can be found on ProQuest and Newspapers.com), I'll accept it. Nighfidelity (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So? Almost all but one aren't connected to the company so you shifted your reasoning. And what's even your point? As long as I have around ten strong sources that firmly establish WP ORGCRIT. What does it matters if the rest are more minor and doesn't? I have Market watch that cites Goldman Sachs saying it's particularly strong on impact on its industry. I have Moody's which doesn't lie and are independent experts that also confirms ita brands are widely recognized globally by fishermen enthusiasts. I have Bloomberg repeatedly reporting on its finances. That alone is enough to establish notability and the rest is irrelevant.JaredMcKenzie (talk) 23:27, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nighfidelity. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Mark Poloncarz is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Mark Poloncarz will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

J. Verne Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]