User talk:Digitalstudies

Thanks for your contributions to Digital Capital. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:23, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sarsenet, thank you for moving this to draftspace. I would like to clarify that the text is not machine-generated; it is based on academic publications and books on Digital Capital (e.g., Ragnedda, 2018, 2020). English is my second language, so I have used tools to ensure the tone is encyclopedic and grammatically correct, but the intellectual content and structure are original scholarly work. I will now further refine the draft to ensure it meets all Wikipedia standards before submitting it for formal review. Best regards Digitalstudies (talk) 13:46, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Digital Capital to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 07:48, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Digitalstudies! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 07:48, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the feedback. However, I must clarify that this text is not AI-generated. I am the scholar who developed this framework, having authored two books and dozens of peer-reviewed articles on Digital Capital. The content is a synthesis of my lifelong research. To ensure neutrality and meet Wikipedia’s standards, I have deliberately cited more independent sources (7) than my own works (3). I have used language tools (grammarly) to refine my English as a non-native speaker, which might have affected the perceived tone, but the intellectual structure and synthesis are entirely original. I will further simplify the prose to remove any perceived 'unencyclopedic' or 'essay-like' qualities Digitalstudies (talk) 05:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the qualification @Digitalstudies. English is not my first language either, so I have some understanding of this, but still it's not allowed under WP:LLM. Grammarly and in particular GrammarlyGo are forms of AI and can only be used to suggest basic wording changes for review by the editor. There is no requirement to have perfect English in articles (which from my point of view is just as well); but there is a full requirement not to use LLM.

From what you are saying, though, you appear to have a conflict of interest if you are using your own literature to support the article. That's OK, particularly in the field of scholarship, but it is in your best interests to put in the declarations under WP:COI. You can put in the template suggested there, and/or put it in your own words on your User Page. I think the latter suggestion is better in this case but it's up to you. ChrysGalley (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. For this reason, the use of AI writing tools for the creation or rewriting of articles, alongside their usage to generate images, sources or comments, save for a few exceptions, is generally prohibited. LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.

As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page, and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! ChrysGalley (talk) 07:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply