User talk:Ctxz2323

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Chinese characters and Collation. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding. Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinese Characters Sorting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 19:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 141Pr {contribs} 19:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! jengod (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chinese word-segmented writing. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 01:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The old article was a draft, and I did not submit it.

Still need to use move?

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 07:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ctxz2323: It's alright, an administrator merged the page history for the draft and the article, so no further action is needed. Just do remember next time that you can move the page to main-space via the move page function. Thanks for your help here! Deauthorized. ^(talk) 15:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, and thanks for your help. Ctxz2323 (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modern Chinese characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Chinese characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walt Yoder (talk) 03:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already replied a bunch at the AfD, but if your article is kept in mainspace (which still looks likely; good luck!), it might set people's minds at ease to add {{under construction}} at the top, and {{empty section}} to the sections without content. That should let everyone who doesn't bother checking the history know that you're actively working on the article. Folly Mox (talk) 02:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea!

Many thanks! Ctxz2323 (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ctxz2323 (talk) 06:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modern Chinese characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Chinese characters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GnocchiFan (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For creating numerous articles on the Chinese language and writing system. (And especially for referencing Chinese language sources that are not widely accessible to English speakers) — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 16:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Is the star really for me? If yes, how can I display it on my user page? Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Barnstar is for you.

There are many ways to display on your user page. My preference is to just copy the entire barnstar wikitext to a section ::of my userpage. See User:BillHPike#Barnstars.

== My barnstars ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[File:Original Barnstar.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For creating numerous articles on the Chinese language and writing system. <small>(And especially for referencing Chinese language  sources that are not widely accessible to English speakers) </small>  — <b>[[User:BillHPike|BillHPike]]</b> <small>([[User talk:BillHPike|talk]], [[Special:contribs/BillHPike|contribs]])</small> 16:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
|}

Other users prefer to convert the barnstar in a WP:Userbox; to do so, you can add: {{User:DangerousPanda/Userboxes/Barnstars/Original}} — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 04:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Ctxz2323 (talk) 10:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Far too much of this is unsourced as is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinese Characters Sorting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. You new article, Chinese character internal structures, is missing a cite for "Yin 2004". There "Yin 2007" and "Peking University 2004", but no "Yin 2004". If this isn't a typo could you add the cite or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 13:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I just wanted to remind you I really appreciate all the new sourcing and content you're bringing to the chinese language articles. there are a few style things i am noticing that you might wanna be aware of! i would recommend perusing the WP:Manual of Style generally if you have the inclination, but there's a few things, like MOS:NOTE with regard to tone, that are generally gonna be copyedited away! i hope this helps you some, i can't imagine writing this much in a second language :) Remsense聊 07:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will read the documents carefully.

I got my PhD in UK, and have published a number of academic papers in English. However, I am still new in wiki, and second language is not as good as first language. Your help is heartedly appreciated! Ctxz2323 (talk) 07:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh goodness, I'm sorry if that came off as condescending! Without equivocation, I really appreciate your work. :) Remsense聊 08:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are kind-hearted. And indeed there is large space for me to improve my wiki writing. Ctxz2323 (talk) 09:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy cooperation and best regards! Ctxz2323 (talk) 09:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will go to visit my sister in China mainland for 2 weeks, during which period Wikipedia may not be accessible to me.

Thanks for your attention. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

have a nice trip! :) Remsense聊 02:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stroke-Based Sorting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chinese character information processing. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and not ready for the mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 13:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chinese character information technology. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and not ready for the mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 13:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chinese character IT into Modern Chinese characters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The section in Modern Chinese characters is a detailed summary of Chinese character IT, a page I have recently created as a subtopic article, which is at least three times longer than the section.

Thanks for your attention. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Just so you know, these notices are often made as the result of (semi-)automated sweeps, so don't worry about it, you're not doing anything at all questionable in this instance.) Remsense留 01:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, now I fill much better. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will explain it a different way. It's okay to copy from one Wikipedia article to another, but when you do so, you need to provide attribution. This is done by saying in your edit summary that the material was copied, and where you got it. Please have a look at this edit summary for an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you have any questions, or have a look at WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 10:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will pay more attention to it. Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Linguistic Barnstar
		I saw that another user gave you a barnstar a couple months ago, but you absolutely deserve another one - your work on Chinese orthography and linguistics is top notch; thank you very much for your contributions! Happy editing,  Frzzl  talk; contribs  23:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

Now I have 2 stars! which will help me to make better and happier contributions. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article Modern Chinese characters was rated as Stub-class when some sections were still empty. Now they are all filled with contents, and a re-rating will be much appreciated.

By the way, we have been working very hard on the article for over 7 months since its creation in May.

Thanks for your attention and Happy the coming Christmas! Ctxz2323 (talk) 03:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:BillHPike submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Ctxz2323 to be Editor of the Week for creating substantial new and important content. In the short time since starting to edit, Ctxz2323 has created or expanded over a dozen articles on Chinese characters, including: Chinese character orders, Chinese character components, Chinese character sounds and Chinese character meanings. These contributions are backed by a plethora of citations to WP:Reliable Sources, with a particular emphasis on offline/non-English sources traditionally under-represented on the English Wikipedia. Ctxz2323 also makes use of the WP:AFC process to ensure new pages are aligned with Wikipedia's editorial policies. Furthermore, Ctxz2323 has participated constructively in editorial processes that can be challenging for newcomers, such as this AFD nomination.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Chinese characters

Ctxz2323

Editor of the Week for the week beginning January 14, 2024

Ctxz2323 has created or expanded over a dozen articles on Chinese characters, including: Chinese character orders, Chinese character components, Chinese character sounds and Chinese character meanings. His contributions are backed with emphasis on offline/non-English sources that are traditionally under-represented on the English Wikipedia. Makes use of the WP:AFC process to ensure new pages are aligned with Wikipedia's editorial policies. Furthermore, Ctxz2323 has participated constructively in editorial processes that can be challenging for newcomers, such as this AFD nomination

Recognized for

getting off to a fast start

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 23:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I am so happy! Ctxz2323 (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The honor belongs to all the editors who jointly made it a success! Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ctxz2323! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Class 1977 (China), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://edu.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0615/c1053-29342071.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Class 1977 (China) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Class 1977 (China), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Class 1977 (China). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Class 1977 (China) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Class 1977 (China) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justiyaya 12:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ctxz2323, translations word for word from a copyrighted work falls under WP:TRANSVIO. I've outlined why I think it is on the article's talk page. Justiyaya 12:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Justiyaya.

We are rewriting at draft:Class of 1977 (China). Ctxz2323 (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Chinese character IT. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North:Thanks! Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, late congratulations on the editor of the week award! Can I ask you why these two articles exist separately from each other? The topic is certainly very interesting, but the two articles are extremely redundant, since large parts of both articles' content is either exactly the same, or very similar to each other. Since both articles are pretty much about the same topic, the only way I see to solve this redundancy would be a merge. Would you be open to merge these two articles into one, retaining all the information that is exclusively written in each of them? --CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your attention to the two articles. I agree that there are quite a few similar contents. The reason why they exist separately include:

1. In China, both terms of “Class of 1977 (77级)" and "Class of 1977-1978 (77-78级)" are popularly used, and they are not the same. "Class of 1977-1978 (77-78级)" include “Class of 1977 (77级)" and “Class of 1978 (78级)". Because these two are similar in some aspects (though not the same), instead of writing another article on "Class of 1978 (77-78级)", I wrote "Class of 1977-1978 (77-78级)".

2. As the first cohort of university student after the resumption of the exam, “Class of 1977 (77级)" should have its own article, instead of being merged with some other class.

3. Another important reason is: article “Class of 1977 (77级)" can also serve as a good introduction to "Examination 1977" or "the resumption of college entry exam in China", which are quite important topics too. While article "Class of 1977-1978 (77-78级)" would not be focused enough. Ctxz2323 (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If merge, we can only merge "Class of 1977 (77级)" into "Class of 1977-1978 (77-78级)" .

But as you can check from their Page information pages, the former has got much more visits from the readers. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely agree that the Class of 77 should have its own article, since it seems like the more significant one. But the Class of 77-78 article indeed has interesting additional information that would not fit the Class of 77 article. So upon further inspection, I guess it doesn't hurt having two separate articles. Maybe I will try to reduce some of the redundancies by doing more cross-linking between the articles. Thank you for your comments and insights! --CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 00:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good ideas. And thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 00:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese character structures, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Lianshao Mining Bureau. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This large Chinese mining company is likely to be notable. The articles seems to be a translation from the Chinese article, so remember that all translations should be acknowledged (see Wikipedia:Translation).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding.

I forgot it (maybe because I created both of the articles). Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Xing Ruiming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bedivere (talk) 04:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the following information relevant to the notability of the article:

1. Ms. Xing Ruiming was the founding head of the first girls’ school in Jieyang, now a city with a population of more than 5 milians according to wiki article Jieyang.
2. The article is on women, about whom we have been encouraged by Wiki to write more.
3. The counterpart Chinese wiki article 邢瑞鳴 has recently passed review and been rated Start-class.

Ctxz2323 (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xing Ruiming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xing Ruiming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 13:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Queshi Church. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Ctxz2323 (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Chinese character frequency. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 12:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangpu Mountain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaxi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese character information processing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese character information technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323, thanks for creating the Hunan Coal Group article! Regarding the "Event" section of this older version, please refrain from presenting news in the press release format of stating the source, reporting location, and date before the content, as the footnote already contains this information. I shifted the story of Daoxiong's sentencing to the history section. Additionally, please try to include the website name, so readers know which information comes from the company, Chinese government, or business reporters. Thanks! BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 20:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the article. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Stroke orders of CJK Unified Ideographs (YES 1 of 2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to CJK Unified Ideographs (YES order). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Wikipedia is not a dictionary or an indiscriminate collection of information. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Chinese character information processing, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Chinese character information technology, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323,

I don't know why these pages were moved to Draft space but it looks like you recreated these redirects in main space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Liz ^{Read! Talk!}

I don't know why they were moved to Draft space either. But it looks like a mistake: What is wrong to redirect "Chinese character information technology" to its short form 'Chinese character IT"? And "Chinese character information processing" is another synonym. That is why I recreated the redirects and agree with your Speedy deletion of the draft files.

Have I done anything wrong?

Thanks for your concern about my wiki editing. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hunan Coal Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunan Coal Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GrabUp - Talk 12:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Class of 1977 (China). Another editor, Dclemens1971, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is a good article, thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dclemens1971: Thanks for your encouragement! Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stroke orders of CJK Unified Ideographs in YES order, part 1 of 4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stroke orders of CJK Unified Ideographs in YES order, part 1 of 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese writing order, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese character writing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese character strokes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Class of 1977–1978 (China). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. The lead should have a bit more on why this set of classes is notable as a topic. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Chongzhen Church has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches in Haikou indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chinese character strokes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

The article is already published. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Churches in Gansu indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Poor and lower-middle peasants. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Needs renaming to describe the actual subject. Which is a Chinese subject and term. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mu (land), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storke orders of CJK Unified Ideographs (YES 2 of 2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I mainly contribute in zhwiki but I notice that you are more active here so I will leave my message here. I see that you have created quite a number of new articles in en and zh, and some of them are written in both languages. For these articles, please take 2 minuets to link them under the same wikidata item, you can learn more at WP:wikidata, thank you. Sohryu Asuka Langley Not Shikinami (talk) 10:13, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try. Ctxz2323 (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, there are also English articles that already have a Chinese version, for example Fujian Theological Seminary (zh:福建神学院) and East China Theological Seminary (zh:华东神学院). In these cases, the wikidata items would have to be merged, I personally use the Merge gadget to do these operations, it would be a 3-click process to merge items after a simple setup. Sohryu Asuka Langley Not Shikinami (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on East China Theological Seminary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Could use an image.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Not found an image within Wikipedia yet. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Zhongnan Theological Seminary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Northeast Theological Seminary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000:, thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323,

Thank you for creating Sheng (volume).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article meets notability, but has prose issues- only the characters and no pinyin is given in places, its mostly just table-needs more prose, and repeats information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will look at it. Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chinese writing order".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Fujian Theological Seminary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 08:07, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Jiangsu Theological Seminary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to reach you via Wikipedia because I can't find another means to contact you.

I am interested in the YES sorting order, and you are the only one of the two coauthors who is contactable. I asked many questions about the YES sorting order in the email I sent, and I apologize if it's too many.

I emailed you rather than posting my questions on this webpage because my questions don't directly relate to Wikipedia or the Wikipedia articles you wrote about the YES sorting order method. However, I am fine asking the questions here if that's your preference.

I appreciate your time! PhalanxDown (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in YES. Yes, we can talk here.

You might have used the email account I used before retirement from the university, which is not accessible to me anymore. Sorry about that. Ctxz2323 (talk) 05:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a YES stroke-input method (IME)? I was surprised I could not find one, given the intuitiveness of the method.

Why was such a sorting order not developed sooner? I am accustomed to alphabets, where the need for a sorting order is obvious. It is obvious to me that previous Chinese sorting orders are not well suited to Chinese characters. Stroke-and-radical sorting order takes too long to use, and phonetic sorting orders (regardless whether Pinyin or Bopomofo) defeat the point of writing Chinese in a (partially phonetic) logography.

Do you, your coauthor Xiaotong Li, or anyone else use the YES sorting order in daily life? How popular is this method in the Sinosphere? Do you advocate for the widespread adoption of the YES sorting order? What barriers are there to this method's adoption?

I think logographic writing like Chinese writing is equal, or superior to, alphabetic writing, but the best scholarship I could find about logographic writing like Chinese is decisively negative. My favorite scholars think Chinese writing is absurdly burdensome. The scholars come from a tradition of scholars who advocated for the complete alphabetization (Latinization) of Chinese writing. Part of their argument is the sorting, encoding, and retrieval difficulties of Chinese characters. Your method, its effectiveness, and popularity might offer a counter-example.

Another of the criticisms against Chinese characters is the inability to make or the great difficulty to disseminate new Chinese characters. Would the YES sorting order be able to accommodate new Chinese characters? Do or would Chinese people make new characters? PhalanxDown (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q2: Why was such a sorting order not developed sooner? I am accustomed to alphabets, where the need for a sorting order is obvious. It is obvious to me that previous Chinese sorting orders are not well suited to Chinese characters. Stroke-and-radical sorting order takes too long to use, and phonetic sorting orders (regardless whether Pinyin or Bopomofo) defeat the point of writing Chinese in a (partially phonetic) logography.

A: Agree! It should appeared earlier. Maybe, people were, and still are, more adhered to the old methods and firmly believe that there are no alphabetical order possible for Chinese characters. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q3: Do you, your coauthor Xiaotong Li, or anyone else use the YES sorting order in daily life? How popular is this method in the Sinosphere? Do you advocate for the widespread adoption of the YES sorting order? What barriers are there to this method's adoption?

A: Yes, Xiaotong and I use the methods in daily life, using the hardcopy handbook, or the other applications introduced on YES stroke alphabetical order. YES is not popular yet, and I do hope for the widespread adoption of the YES sorting order. One important barrier is "few people know it, and less really know it"! Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What information does the handbook contain? Does the handbook contain any new information not already included in the 2015 conference paper or the Wikipedia articles? I cannot read the handbook because it is written in Chinese (I think I am foolish for wanting a Chinese author of a Chinese book for a Chinese audience to cater to my English monolingualism; I am chuckling about my folly). Have I missed any other details about the method?

Have you convinced others, outside of yourself and your co-author (perhaps family or friends) to switch to the YES method? Was there anything that especially convinced them? Is interest confined only to Mandarin speakers? How intense is the overall advocacy, and by what means? Is there an organization promoting this method?

Are there any disadvantages to the YES method, or it least false disadvantages that an ignorant person might think is there? The method's merits are obvious to me- I just wonder why other people are missing it. Japanese writers would benefit from such a system, as well as non-Mandarin speakers, so I am confused why after 10 years since the 2015 conference paper I have only now heard of this method. (Thank you for creating the Wikipedia article, I would not have found it otherwise!).

Would you prefer that foreigners using Chinese characters in bibliographic citations of Chinese-language documents also switch to this method of sorting?

How long did it take you and your coauthor to devise this method? Why undertake this to begin with? If you were a faculty member, you could have done many things with your time, why this? Orthographic changes are often slow and difficult to disseminate (though this one seems easy and obvious to me), so the fact you undertook making this method shows dedication and long-term interest.

Again, I apologize if this is too many questions. Are there any English language resources I can use to learn further? PhalanxDown (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, you can learn more about YES by the YES-CEDICT Chinese Dictionary, which is written in English and sorted by both simplified and traditional Chinese characters. (click the 2 PDF links in the references to open)

• The YES-CEDICT Chinese Dictionary (一二三漢英大詞典, Trial Edition, Sorted by Traditional Chinese, a Chinese–English dictionary of over 110,000 word entries). ^[1]
• The YES-CEDICT Chinese Dictionary (一二三汉英大词典, Trial Edition, Sorted by Simplified Chinese, a Chinese–English dictionary of over 110,000 word entries). ^[2]

Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The dictionary is excellent. Thank you! PhalanxDown (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. And thank you for your interest. Ctxz2323 (talk) 06:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One final question, now that I remember it: the latinization scholars I mentioned before claimed that Chinese writers forget how to write Chinese characters if they do not physically hand-write the Chinese characters enough. They claim that the muscle memory of writing Chinese characters aids the recollection of Chinese characters. They call the forgetting of Chinese characters "Character Amnesia". They claim this is worsens when people use phonetic inputs for computing. Do you know if people who use the YES method avoid or mitigate Character Amnesia?

I am very grateful for your time answering my questions. Thank you! PhalanxDown (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YES should be able to help avoid character amnesia, since it helps people to write Chinese characters in standard stroke orders. However, I haven't made such experiments yet.

Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article Chinese character orders will help you to see the differences of YES comparing with the traditional methods. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q4: I think logographic writing like Chinese writing is equal, or superior to, alphabetic writing, but the best scholarship I could find about logographic writing like Chinese is decisively negative. My favorite scholars think Chinese writing is absurdly burdensome. The scholars come from a tradition of scholars who advocated for the complete alphabetization (Latinization) of Chinese writing. Part of their argument is the sorting, encoding, and retrieval difficulties of Chinese characters. Your method, its effectiveness, and popularity might offer a counter-example.

A: Hope so, and thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Q5: Another of the criticisms against Chinese characters is the inability to make or the great difficulty to disseminate new Chinese characters. Would the YES sorting order be able to accommodate new Chinese characters? Do or would Chinese people make new characters?

A: I think, YES can deal with it, because Chinese characters are made of components with their existing stroke orders. There will be few new Chinese characters, as many linguistic needs can be met by making new words composed of multiple existing characters. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Let me answer your questions one by one.

Q1: Is there a YES stroke-input method (IME)? I was surprised I could not find one, given the intuitiveness of the method.

A: Yes, I developed one a few years ago in the form of a website, but have not found a proper place to upload it yet. It is a simple app allowing the input of a stroke order code from a YES soft keyboard and output the matched Chinese CJK character(s). In most cases, you can quickly find your target Chinese character after keying in 5 strokes or less, which is, I believe, more straightforward than the Stroke-and-radical lookup tool on the Unicode website. Ctxz2323 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Fen (length). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Luo An (academician). Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

he may well pass WP:NPROF. Unfortunately someone else has the Google Scholar profile An Luo and there are three "A Luo" profiles and other L An profiles. Hence I cannot verify his publication record. Since everything must be verifiable, I have to mark this with unclear notability. Please find a way to include information about his publications

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: According to source ^[3]. Luo An's representative publications include, most of which are indexed in SCI or EI:

四、代表性著作与论文

[1] 专著：罗安，《电能质量治理和高效用能技术与装备》，中国电力出版社，2014 (textbook in Chinese)

[2] 专著：罗安，《电网谐波治理和无功补偿技术及装备》，中国电力出版社，2006 (textbook)

[3] Expansion of the ohm’s law in non-sinusoidal AC circuit, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2015，62（3）：1363-1371 （SCI、EI）

[4] Large-scale photovoltaic plant harmonic transmission model and analysis on resonance characteristics, IET Power Electronics, 2015, 8(4): 565-573 （SCI、EI）

[5] Development and Application of the Two-Phase Orthogonal Power Supply for Electromagnetic Stirring，IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 2013，28（8）：3438-3446 （SCI、EI）

[6] An Improved Reactive Current Detection and Power Control Method for Single-Phase Photovoltaic Grid-Connected DG System, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, 2013，28（4）：823-831 （SCI、EI）

[7] Robust predictive dual-loop control strategy with reactive power compensation for single-phase grid-connected DG system, IET. Power Electronics，2013，6（7）：1320-1328 （SCI、EI）

[8] Combined System for Harmonic Suppression and Reactive Power Compensation，IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron，2012，56（2）：796-801（SCI、EI）

[9] Power Electronic Hybrid System for Load Balancing Compensation and Frequency-Selective Harmonic Suppression，IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2012，59（2）：723-732 （SCI、EI）

[10] Railway Static Power Conditioners for High-speed Train Traction Power Supply Systems Using Three-phase V/V Transformers， IEEE Trans. Power. Electron, 2011，26（10）：2844-2856 （SCI、EI）

[11] Double closed-loop control method for injection-type hybrid active power filter, IEEE Trans. Power. Electronics,2011，26（9）：2393-2403 （SCI、EI）

[12] Dual-Loop Power Control for Single-Phase Grid-Connected Converters with LCL Filter. J. Power Electronics, 2011，11（4）：456-463 （SCI、EI）

[13] Feedback-Feed forward PI-Type Iterative Learning Control Strategy for Hybrid Active Power Filter With Injection Circuit， IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2010，57（11）：3767-3779 （SCI、EI）

[14] Design Considerations for Maintaining DC-Side Voltage of Hybrid Active Power Filter With Injection Circuit，IEEE Trans. Power. Electronics，2009，24（1）：75-84 （SCI、EI）

[15] Development of Hybrid Active Power Filter Based on the Adaptive Fuzzy Dividing Frequency-Control Method，IEEE Trans. Power Delivery，2009，24（1）：424-432 （SCI、EI）

[16] A Novel Three-Phase Hybrid Active Power Filter with a Series Resonance Circuit Tuned at the Fundamental Frequency，IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron，2009，56（7）：2431-2440 （SCI、EI）

[17] Fuzzy-PI-Based Direct-Output-Voltage Control Strategy for the STATCOM Used in Utility Distribution Systems，IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron，2009，56（7）：2401-2411 （SCI、EI）

[18] Dividing Frequency Control of Hybrid Active Power Filter With Multi-Injection Branches Using Improved Algorithm，IEEE Trans. Power. Electronics，2009，24（10）：2396-2405 （SCI、EI）

[19] A Dynamic Hybrid Var Compensator and a Two-Level Collaborative Optimization Compensation Method，IEEE Trans. Power. Electronics，2009，24（9）：2091-2100 （SCI、EI）

[20] Study on a Novel Hybrid Active Power Filter Applied to a High-Voltage Grid，IEEE Trans. Power Delivery，2009，24（4）：2344-2352 （SCI、EI）

[21] Fuzzy-PI-based Direct Output Voltage Control Strategy for the STATCOM Used in Utility Distribution Systems， IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 2009，56（7）：2401-2411 （SCI、EI） Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have just mentioned it in the wiki article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luo_An_(academician)#Research_achievements.

Thanks for your attention. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read carefully what I wrote. Nobody can verify that he is a highly cited scientist, and the list above is not relevant; you have to make the article convincing. You need to find a way to verify that he us notable on the page. You cannot give a list of publications, or just state something. If you persuaded him to create a Google Scholar profile or a Scopus Profile those would work.

Please don't respond here giving me information, that is not verification. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Anhui Theological Seminary. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on 123 order. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

123 isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:

The Chinese name "一二三" literally means "one, two, three", as mentioned in the Top section of the target page, therefore "123 order" is another short name, in addition to "YES order".

Thanks for your attention. Ctxz2323 (talk) 12:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Peking University First Hospital. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Xiangya Hospital. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article for a large and historic hospital in China. It is appropriately referenced and focussed on the topic, with a neutral tone. I've made some very minor changes related to spacing around citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for the hospital; it seems more complete than the .zh page too!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support! Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for bringing this selective translation from Chinese Wiki to here. It is appropriately referenced with clear English.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for bringing this translation to .en from .zh. The article is clear and well-written. The one change I made was to reduced the contact information, on the basis of WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. The hospital has a significant history, is large, and affiliated with a large university.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Wuhan Tongji Hospital. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for bringing this translation from .zh to .en. The hospital has a singificant history, over about 125 years. The article is appropriately referenced, linked, formatted and referenced.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Xijing Hospital. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for another helpful hospital translation for an institution with a history going back to 1939.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:07, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 11:01, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Nanfang Hospital. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for bringing another hospital translation; this is a helpful and clear article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dangdai (literary magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Hong Kong University Libraries has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I copied some fragments from the sources with acknowledgement. Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on National Taiwan University College of Medicine. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on National Taiwan University Press. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create this article! Have a beautiful and blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for the review Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323,

Thank you for creating Tsinghua University Computer Science Department.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Pleasee fix copy and paste issue found per WP:EARWIG

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Agent 007 (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Issues addressed. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Christian Weekly. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:46, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Chinese Union Bible with New Punctuation. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time and energy to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Chinese Christian Tribune. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 09:51, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding.

I missed it again. Ctxz2323 (talk) 10:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ctxz2323,

Thank you for creating Chinese Christian Tribune.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating the article. Additional sources may be helpful, beyond the chinese Encyclopedia and Tribune.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noxoug1}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noxoug1 (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are right.

I have searched for sources with Copilot, Bing and Google. 2nd or 3rd-party sources are very few. Will try again. Ctxz2323 (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issues addressed. Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 06:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ctxz2323. Thank you for your work on Tsinghua University School of Medicine. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for bringing this acknowledged translation fromt the Chinese Wikipedia, then working to improve it. A referenced, clear and helpful contribution as a place to discuss the university school of medicine and its affiliated institutes and hospitals. A large topic!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review! Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:28, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modern Chinese characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Chinese characters (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ltbdl (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christianity in Hong Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lutheran Theological Seminary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

issue fixed Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:54, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social Sciences in China (journal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESCI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Strategic Study of CAE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Categories: Chinese Academy of Engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ACROM12 [TALK] 02:00, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it is supposed to be a category, not an article. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Strategic Study of CAE. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 10:53, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Lutheran Theological Seminary (Hong Kong), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Academic Degrees Committee of the State Council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 09:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Copilot text has been deleted, though it was for further review and editing. Ctxz2323 (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That is both demonstrably false and missing the point. Please stop using LLMs, and write your Wikipedia contributions yourself. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 09:55, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure Copilot can not be used at all? Or it can be used under conditions? Ctxz2323 (talk) 10:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sure that these tools are all completely unsuitable for use on Wikipedia, especially by users who are otherwise not able to write their Wikipedia contributions themselves. You also did not explain why you made a demonstrably false claim. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 10:13, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"demonstrably false claim"?

Check the editing history of the page, and you will see my "undo" process.

However, your reminding words have been helpful, thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This paragraph was insert in Diff/1333517997 but it still present in the draft at Permalink/1333530434:

The Academic Degrees Committee of the State Council (ADCSC; Chinese: 国务院学位委员会) is the highest administrative body responsible for academic degrees in the People’s Republic of China. It operates under the State Council and oversees the national system of academic degrees, including the authorization, supervision, and evaluation of bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees. The committee functions as a central policymaking and regulatory institution for graduate education and academic standards across Chinese higher education.
— Diff/1333517997

You undid the edit with the emojis in Diff/1333531148, did you maybe get those two mixed up? The other WP:AITELLS (the byte sequence, hallucinated {{cite web}} parameters and literal [1]/[2]) are still present in the draft. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I got them mixed up. The other one, which you displayed above, has been deleted as well.

Now, all the texts from Copilot are deleted, can you please take away the "Speedy deletion" label from the draft? Thanks. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and I will AGF and take your word for it. I am not at a computer right now, but feel free to remove the {{db-llm}} tag yourself. Just link to this conversation in the edit summary. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 23:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Managed to hack it off using my phone, figured it was better to get it done to avoid a WP:REFUND request later. :) --Gurkubondinn (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ctxz2323 (talk) 01:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Asia Lutheran Seminary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will improve it, thank you! Ctxz2323 (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]