Talk:Wayback Machine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wayback Machine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Internet High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Digital Preservation This article is within the scope of WikiProject Digital Preservation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of digital preservation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Digital PreservationWikipedia:WikiProject Digital PreservationTemplate:WikiProject Digital PreservationDigital Preservation Wikipedia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

https://www.topspeed.com/ ..."SEO bait" content?

I have seen others. Should there be a list article?

Piñanana (talk) 19:30, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't get independent third-party sources discussing websites excluded by Wayback Machine, then it is not noteworthy. Also, these questions belong to the WP:Reference desk. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:28, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

search: excluded from the Wayback Machine

https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/List_of_websites_excluded_from_the_Wayback_Machine/Partial_exclusions

Piñanana (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Tertiary sources. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And once again, this page is not the place to discuss this. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"429 Too Many Requests nginx". This error appears every time i open up Web Archive since past month. Do you also see it? --~2025-31413-92 (talk) 11:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can someone tell me why its down? TVShowsFan2005 (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

maybe ask someone ~2026-10292-14 (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I found early archives on the wayback machine and even a thread where users discussed old finds. I cited both in the article text currently citations 8 and 9. However per Help:CS1 errors the citations linked for the oldest archive will always be invalid due to the rules of Help:Citation Style 1. The current citation has an error for a malformed timestamp on the archive url. Just something I thought I would point out and put here on the talk page so that the article content does not get removed without reason. Let me know your thoughts and if you can find an older archive than the BBC web server page 1995 on the wayback machine.

year is earlier than archiver launch date of

• 1996 for archive.org

Lazypenguin4507 (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]