Talk:Techron
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The content of Techroline was merged into Techron on 2014-12-12. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Could someone with access to the SAE International site describe the conclusions of relevant papers?
[edit][1] and [2] look pertinent. John Nevard 23:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Chevron site a bit light on description
[edit]Could someone who knows _exactly_ what's in the additive clarify exactly what they are using? [3] seems to be Chevron Research's most general disclosure of their work. John Nevard 00:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
advert tag added
[edit]while the article is a valiant attempt at pretending it's from a 3rd person view, there is no reference to any chemistry data or any assessment about 'what' is Techron - reader in merely being referred to claims by the manufacturers. This is not an encyclopedis article - it is a PR briefing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.60.80 (talk) 00:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
MERGE/DELETE
[edit]Not sure why this page is even here. Techron is just a name brand for polyetheramine mixture, and I agree reads like an AD. If anything it should be a blurb on a polyetheramine/Chemical page. 90moredays (talk) 18:42, 8 August 2012 (UTC)