Talk:CISQ
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CISQ article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Request for POV-check
[edit]This page have been revamped regarding the CISQ history and contributions for Software Quality. This organisation is working actively to provide best practises in software developments.
Links
[edit]Added link from CAST Application Intelligence Platform-- Jsub (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Added link from Software quality -- Jsub (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Added link from OutSystems -- Jsub (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Added link from Capers Jones -- Jsub (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Added link from Object Management Group -- Jsub (talk) 15:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Some proposed changes
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Edit request
|
|---|
|
The Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ) [1] is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software[2] The mission of CISQ is to develop international standards to automate software quality measurement and to promote the development and sustainment of secure, reliable, and trustworthy software.[3] Through the work of CISQ, standards have been developed to measure software size[4][5], structural quality[6], and technical debt[7] from source code. Overview[edit]Jointly organized by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie Mellon University and the Object Management Group (OMG), CISQ is designed to be a neutral forum in which customers and suppliers of IT application software can develop an industry-wide agenda of actions for defining, measuring, and improving IT software quality.[8][9] Software measurement standards are being developed by CISQ to help provide a foundation for focusing attention, setting quality targets, providing visibility, and tracking improvement progress[10]. By using violations of good architectural and coding practice as the basis for software quality measurement, development teams can learn from the results and avoid whole classes of weaknesses in future development. History[edit]CISQ was launched in August 2009 by 24 founders including SEI and OMG.[2] The founders of CISQ are Paul D. Nielsen, Director and CEO of SEI and Richard Mark Soley, Chairman and CEO of OMG. Bill Curtis, the co-author of the CMM framework is CISQ's first Director. Software measurement and productivity expert Capers Jones is a CISQ Distinguished Advisor. In September 2012, CISQ published its standard measures for evaluating and benchmarking the reliability, security, performance efficiency, and maintainability of IT software.[11] In January 2013, OMG adopted Automated Function Point specifications.[12] In May 2013 CISQ reached 500 members.[13] In December 2013, WIPRO become the fourth major sponsor to join the list of industry participants investing in the completion and adoption of CISQ standards in the IT industry.[14] In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications[15]. In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification[16]. In January 2018, OMG adopted the Technical Debt specification[17]. In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto[18]. In April 2019, CISQ updated its Automated Source Code Quality Measures with embedded extensions[19]. In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019[20]. References
|
TracieB1283 (talk) 18:34, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Some proposed changes
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Edit request
|
|---|
• Information to be added or removed: In the first sentence that reads, “The Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ) is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software.[1] “ I request the name of the Consortium be changed to “Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ).” • Explanation of issue: On June 20, 2019, CISQ officially changed its name from the Consortium for IT Software Quality to the Consortium for Information & Software Quality. The acronym, CISQ, is still the same. • References supporting change: Here is the CISQ blog post announcing the name change: https://blog.it-cisq.org/2019/06/announcing-cisqs-new-name.html. Also, if you visit the CISQ website at www.it-cisq.org, which is noted as the Consortia’s URL on Wikipedia, you will see the new name of CISQ. CITATION STYLE: The Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ) [1] is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software.[1].
• Information to be added or removed: Please update the CISQ logo to: https://www.it-cisq.org/images/logos/CISQ-logo.png • Explanation of issue: On June 20, 2019, CISQ officially changed its name from the “Consortium for IT Software Quality” to the “Consortium for Information & Software Quality.” The acronym, CISQ, remains the same, which is why we do not require a move or name change to the CISQ Wikipedia page, as its named CISQ. The logo file was updated in June. • References supporting change: Here is the CISQ blog post announcing the name change: https://blog.it-cisq.org/2019/06/announcing-cisqs-new-name.html. Also, if you visit the CISQ website at www.it-cisq.org, which is noted as the Consortia’s URL on Wikipedia, you will see the new name. • I do not see where I can make this update myself
• Information to be added or removed: In the first section, please add a paragraph after this sentence that currently reads, “The Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ) is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software.[1] “ that says: “The mission of CISQ is to develop international standards to automate software quality measurement and to promote the development and sustainment of secure, reliable, and trustworthy software. Through the work of CISQ, standards have been developed to measure software size, structural quality, and technical debt from source code.” • Explanation of issue: This text is taken from CISQ’s mission statement on its website and the standards developed for software size, structural quality and technical debt are available for use in the public domain. • References supporting change: o Link to CISQ’s mission statement: “An Industry Consortium to Advance Software Quality,” https://www.it-cisq.org/overview.htm. o Link to software sizing standards on CISQ website: https://www.it-cisq.org/standards/software-sizing-standards/. If you would prefer, here are two direct links to the software sizing standards provided by OMG, the standards body that publishes CISQ measures as standards. “Automated Function Points” https://www.omg.org/spec/AFP. “Automated Enhancement Points” https://www.omg.org/spec/AEP/. Here is a press release announcement for each software sizing standard adopted by OMG. OMG press release dated January 17, 2013, “OMG Adopts Automated Function Point Specification,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2013/01-17-13.htm. CISQ press release on BusinessWire dated October 11, 2016, “CISQ’s Automated Enhancement Points Metric Becomes Object Management Group Standard for Software Sizing,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161011006043/en/CISQ%E2%80%99s-Automated-Enhancement-Points-Metric-Object-Management. o Link to structural quality standards on CISQ website: https://www.it-cisq.org/standards/code-quality-standards/. If you would prefer, here is a direct link to the structural quality standards provided by OMG, the standards body that publishes CISQ measures as standards. https://www.omg.org/spec/category/cisq/. Here is a press release announcement from OMG announcing the approval of CISQ’s structural quality standards dated October 5, 2015, “Object Management Group BOD Adopts Five Standards and Two Submissions at Cambridge, Massachusetts Meeting,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2015/10-05-15.htm. Here is the CISQ press release announcing the same, dated September15, 2015, “Consortium for IT Software Quality Announces New Specifications for Measuring Structural Quality of Software,” https://www.it-cisq.org/consortium-for-it-software-quality-announces-new-specifications-for-measuring-structural-quality-of-software-2/index.htm. Also, here is an SD Times article, dated September 15, 2015, “OMG to approve CISQ software measurements as standards,” https://sdtimes.com/cisq/omg-approves-cisq-software-measurements-as-standards/. o Link to the technical debt standard on CISQ website: https://www.it-cisq.org/standards/technical-debt/index.htm If you would prefer, here is a direct link to the technical debt standard provided by OMG, the standards body that publishes the CISQ measures as standards. https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM/. A CISQ press release announcement on BusinessWire dated January 2, 2018, “CISQ Produces Standard for Measuring Technical Debt,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180102005078/en/CISQ-Produces-Standard-Measuring-Technical-Debt. CITATION STYLE: The mission of CISQ is to develop international standards to automate software quality measurement and to promote the development and sustainment of secure, reliable, and trustworthy software.[2] Through the work of CISQ, standards have been developed to measure software size[3][4], structural quality[5], and technical debt[6] from source code.
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “Overview” section, request to add a 2nd paragraph that reads: “Software measurement standards are being developed by CISQ to help provide a foundation for focusing attention, setting quality targets, providing visibility, and tracking improvement progress. By using violations of good architectural and coding practice as the basis for software quality measurement, development teams can learn from the results and avoid whole classes of weaknesses in future development.” • Explanation of issue: The current “Overview” section on Wikipedia does not mention CISQ’s primary service to the industry, which is the development of standards for software measurement. This paragraph adds depth to what’s there currently. • References supporting change: SD Times article dated January 5, 2015, “CISQ aims to ensure industry-wide software quality standards,” https://sdtimes.com/cisq/cisq-aims-ensure-industry-wide-software-quality-standards/. Page 3 of the SD Times article includes this summary of CISQ’s focus, as written above: https://sdtimes.com/cisq/cisq-aims-ensure-industry-wide-software-quality-standards/3/. CITATION STYLE Software measurement standards are being developed by CISQ to help provide a foundation for focusing attention, setting quality targets, providing visibility, and tracking improvement progress[7]. By using violations of good architectural and coding practice as the basis for software quality measurement, development teams can learn from the results and avoid whole classes of weaknesses in future development.
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications.” • Explanation of issue: OMG adopted CISQ’s specification for Automated Source Code Quality Measures as a standard in October 2015. • References supporting change: Here is a press release announcement from OMG announcing the approval of CISQ’s structural quality standards dated October 5, 2015, “Object Management Group BOD Adopts Five Standards and Two Submissions at Cambridge, Massachusetts Meeting,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2015/10-05-15.htm. CITATION STYLE: In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications[8].
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification.” • Explanation of issue: OMG adopted CISQ’s specification for Automated Enhancement Points in October 2016. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release on BusinessWire dated October 11, 2016, “CISQ’s Automated Enhancement Points Metric Becomes Object Management Group Standard for Software Sizing,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161011006043/en/CISQ%E2%80%99s-Automated-Enhancement-Points-Metric-Object-Management. CITATION STYLE In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification[9].
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In January 2018, OMG adopted the Technical Debt specification.” • Explanation of issue: OMG adopted CISQ’s Technical Debt specification in January 2018. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release announcement on BusinessWire dated January 2, 2018, “CISQ Produces Standard for Measuring Technical Debt,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180102005078/en/CISQ-Produces-Standard-Measuring-Technical-Debt. CITATION STYLE: In January 2018, OMG adopted the Technical Debt specification[10].
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto.” • Explanation of issue: CISQ published a Trustworthy Systems Manifesto in November 2018 as an open, shareable document that organizations read and sign to help set policy in their organizations for the development of trustworthy software-intensive systems. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release announcement on Business Insider dated November 1, 2018, “Consortium for IT Software Quality Launches Trustworthy Systems Manifesto,” https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/consortium-for-it-software-quality-launches-trustworthy-systems-manifesto-1027681337. CITATION STYLE: In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto[11].
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In April 2019, CISQ updated its Automated Source Code Quality Measures with embedded extensions.” • Explanation of issue: CISQ published an update to its Automated Source Code Quality Measures specification to include considerations for embedded software. The updated specification was adopted by OMG. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release announcement on PR Web, dated April 4, 2019, https://www.prweb.com/releases/cisq_updates_automated_source_code_quality_measures_with_embedded_extensions/prweb16211383.htm. CITATION STYLE: In April 2019, CISQ updated its Automated Source Code Quality Measures with embedded extensions[12].
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019.” • Explanation of issue: ISO approved the Automated Function Points specification as ISO 19515:2019. • References supporting change: Here’s a press release on OMG’s website dated June 3, 2019, “ISO/IEC Approves Object Management Group Standard for Automated Function Points,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2019/06-03-19.htm. CITATION STYLE: In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019[13]. References
|
TracieB1283 (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Reply 14-JUL-2019
The WP:CS1 formatted references need to be placed within the proposed text. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.
Spintendo 05:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Some proposed changes
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested text's references are not formatted according to the citation style predominantly in use with the subject article (WP:CITEVAR). Any additions proposed for an article should have references which are formatted according to the style already in use with the article. Please see the Reply section below for more information. |
Information to be added or removed:
Edit request
|
|---|
|
• In the first sentence that reads, “The Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ) is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software.[1] “ request the name of the Consortium to be changed to “Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ).” • Explanation of issue: On June 20, 2019, CISQ officially changed its name from the Consortium for IT Software Quality to the Consortium for Information & Software Quality. The acronym, CISQ, is still the same. • References supporting change: Here is the CISQ blog post announcing the name change: https://blog.it-cisq.org/2019/06/announcing-cisqs-new-name.html. Also, if you visit the CISQ website at www.it-cisq.org, which is noted as the Consortia’s URL on Wikipedia, you will see the new name of CISQ. • Information to be added or removed: Please update the CISQ logo to: https://www.it-cisq.org/images/logos/CISQ-logo.png • Explanation of issue: On June 20, 2019, CISQ officially changed its name from the “Consortium for IT Software Quality” to the “Consortium for Information & Software Quality.” The acronym, CISQ, remains the same, which is why we do not require a move or name change to the CISQ wikipedia page, as its named CISQ. The logo file was updated in June. • References supporting change: Here is the CISQ blog post announcing the name change: https://blog.it-cisq.org/2019/06/announcing-cisqs-new-name.html. Also, if you visit the CISQ website at www.it-cisq.org, which is noted as the Consortia’s URL on Wikipedia, you will see the new name. • Information to be added or removed: In the first section, please add a paragraph after this sentence that currently reads, “The Consortium for IT Software Quality (CISQ) is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software.[1] “ that says: “The mission of CISQ is to develop international standards to automate software quality measurement and to promote the development and sustainment of secure, reliable, and trustworthy software. Through the work of CISQ, standards have been developed to measure software size, structural quality, and technical debt from source code.” • Explanation of issue: This text is taken from CISQ’s mission statement on its website and the standards developed for software size, structural quality and technical debt are available for use in the public domain. • References supporting change: o Link to CISQ’s mission statement: “An Industry Consortium to Advance Software Quality,” https://www.it-cisq.org/overview.htm. o Link to software sizing standards on CISQ website: https://www.it-cisq.org/standards/software-sizing-standards/. If you would prefer, here are two direct links to the software sizing standards provided by OMG, the standards body that publishes CISQ measures as standards. “Automated Function Points” https://www.omg.org/spec/AFP. “Automated Enhancement Points” https://www.omg.org/spec/AEP/. Here is a press release announcement for each software sizing standard adopted by OMG. OMG press release dated January 17, 2013, “OMG Adopts Automated Function Point Specification,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2013/01-17-13.htm. CISQ press release on BusinessWire dated October 11, 2016, “CISQ’s Automated Enhancement Points Metric Becomes Object Management Group Standard for Software Sizing,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161011006043/en/CISQ%E2%80%99s-Automated-Enhancement-Points-Metric-Object-Management. o Link to structural quality standards on CISQ website: https://www.it-cisq.org/standards/code-quality-standards/. If you would prefer, here is a direct link to the structural quality standards provided by OMG, the standards body that publishes CISQ measures as standards. https://www.omg.org/spec/category/cisq/. Here is a press release announcement from OMG announcing the approval of CISQ’s structural quality standards dated October 5, 2015, “Object Management Group BOD Adopts Five Standards and Two Submissions at Cambridge, Massachusetts Meeting,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2015/10-05-15.htm. Here is the CISQ press release announcing the same, dated September15, 2015, “Consortium for IT Software Quality Announces New Specifications for Measuring Structural Quality of Software,” https://www.it-cisq.org/consortium-for-it-software-quality-announces-new-specifications-for-measuring-structural-quality-of-software-2/index.htm. Also, here is an SD Times article, dated September 15, 2015, “OMG to approve CISQ software measurements as standards,” https://sdtimes.com/cisq/omg-approves-cisq-software-measurements-as-standards/. o Link to the technical debt standard on CISQ website: https://www.it-cisq.org/standards/technical-debt/index.htm If you would prefer, here is a direct link to the technical debt standard provided by OMG, the standards body that publishes the CISQ measures as standards. https://www.omg.org/spec/ATDM/. A CISQ press release announcement on BusinessWire dated January 2, 2018, “CISQ Produces Standard for Measuring Technical Debt,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180102005078/en/CISQ-Produces-Standard-Measuring-Technical-Debt. • Information to be added or removed: Under the “Overview” section, request to add a 2nd paragraph that reads: “Software measurement standards are being developed by CISQ to help provide a foundation for focusing attention, setting quality targets, providing visibility, and tracking improvement progress. By using violations of good architectural and coding practice as the basis for software quality measurement, development teams can learn from the results and avoid whole classes of weaknesses in future development.” • Explanation of issue: The current “Overview” section on Wikipedia does not mention CISQ’s primary service to the industry, which is the development of standards for software measurement. This paragraph adds depth to what’s there currently. • References supporting change: SD Times article dated January 5, 2015, “CISQ aims to ensure industry-wide software quality standards,” https://sdtimes.com/cisq/cisq-aims-ensure-industry-wide-software-quality-standards/. Page 3 of the SD Times article includes this summary of CISQ’s focus, as written above: https://sdtimes.com/cisq/cisq-aims-ensure-industry-wide-software-quality-standards/3/. • Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications.” • Explanation of issue: OMG adopted CISQ’s specification for Automated Source Code Quality Measures as a standard in October 2015. • References supporting change: Here is a press release announcement from OMG announcing the approval of CISQ’s structural quality standards dated October 5, 2015, “Object Management Group BOD Adopts Five Standards and Two Submissions at Cambridge, Massachusetts Meeting,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2015/10-05-15.htm. • Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification.” • Explanation of issue: OMG adopted CISQ’s specification for Automated Enhancement Points in October 2016. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release on BusinessWire dated October 11, 2016, “CISQ’s Automated Enhancement Points Metric Becomes Object Management Group Standard for Software Sizing,” https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161011006043/en/CISQ%E2%80%99s-Automated-Enhancement-Points-Metric-Object-Management.
• Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto.” • Explanation of issue: CISQ published a Trustworthy Systems Manifesto in November 2018 as an open, shareable document that organizations read and sign to help set policy in their organizations for the development of trustworthy software-intensive systems. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release announcement on Business Insider dated November 1, 2018, “Consortium for IT Software Quality Launches Trustworthy Systems Manifesto,” https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/consortium-for-it-software-quality-launches-trustworthy-systems-manifesto-1027681337. • Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In April 2019, CISQ updates its Automated Source Code Quality Measures with embedded extensions.” • Explanation of issue: CISQ published an update to its Automated Source Code Quality Measures specification to include considerations for embedded software. The updated specification was adopted by OMG. • References supporting change: Here’s a CISQ press release announcement on PR Web, dated April 4, 2019, https://www.prweb.com/releases/cisq_updates_automated_source_code_quality_measures_with_embedded_extensions/prweb16211383.htm. • Information to be added or removed: Under the “History” section, request to add an entry that reads: “In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019.” • Explanation of issue: ISO approved the Automated Function Points specification as ISO 19515:2019. • References supporting change: Here’s a press release on OMG’s website dated June 3, 2019, “ISO/IEC Approves Object Management Group Standard for Automated Function Points,” https://www.omg.org/news/releases/pr2019/06-03-19.htm. References |
TracieB1283 (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Reply 03-JUL-2019
[edit]Reply message
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Notes
References
|
Regards, Spintendo 03:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Edit Request - A follow-on to previous attempts by me to add information to CISQ's wiki - trying my hardest! thank you!
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Per WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE. |
Hi. I received feedback that I should include the full code for the page, including the additions I am requesting. Below is the code. Thank you! You can see my previous requested edit attempts on the Talk page. I had previously used the format of Information to be added or removed, Explanation of issue, References supporting change. I hope this extra detail provides rationale the information I am adding. The information is non-controversial. - Tracie
Edit request
|
|---|
|
The Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ) [1] is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software[2] The mission of CISQ is to develop international standards to automate software quality measurement and to promote the development and sustainment of secure, reliable, and trustworthy software.[3] Through the work of CISQ, standards have been developed to measure software size[4][5], structural quality[6], and technical debt[7] from source code. Overview[edit]Jointly organized by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie Mellon University and the Object Management Group (OMG), CISQ is designed to be a neutral forum in which customers and suppliers of IT application software can develop an industry-wide agenda of actions for defining, measuring, and improving IT software quality.[8][9] Software measurement standards are being developed by CISQ to help provide a foundation for focusing attention, setting quality targets, providing visibility, and tracking improvement progress[10]. By using violations of good architectural and coding practice as the basis for software quality measurement, development teams can learn from the results and avoid whole classes of weaknesses in future development. History[edit]CISQ was launched in August 2009 by 24 founders including SEI and OMG.[2] The founders of CISQ are Paul D. Nielsen, Director and CEO of SEI and Richard Mark Soley, Chairman and CEO of OMG. Bill Curtis, the co-author of the CMM framework is CISQ's first Director. Software measurement and productivity expert Capers Jones is a CISQ Distinguished Advisor. In September 2012, CISQ published its standard measures for evaluating and benchmarking the reliability, security, performance efficiency, and maintainability of IT software.[11] In January 2013, OMG adopted Automated Function Point specifications.[12] In May 2013 CISQ reached 500 members.[13] In December 2013, WIPRO become the fourth major sponsor to join the list of industry participants investing in the completion and adoption of CISQ standards in the IT industry.[14] In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications[15]. In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification[16]. In January 2018, OMG adopted the Technical Debt specification[17]. In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto[18]. In April 2019, CISQ updated its Automated Source Code Quality Measures with embedded extensions[19]. In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019[20]. References
|
TracieB1283 (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Reply 6-OCT-2019
[edit]
Unable to review
- If the COI editor receives, or expects to receive, compensation for any contribution they make, they must disclose their employer, client, and affiliation to comply with Wikipedia's terms of use and the policy on paid editing.
- Please note that this appears to be the last step needed to be taken before the review may begin.
Regards, Spintendo 03:06, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please make the following changes:
Hi. I received feedback that I should include the full code for the page, including the additions I am requesting. Below is the code. You can see my previous requested edit attempts on the Talk page. I had previously used the format of Information to be added or removed, Explanation of issue, References supporting change. I hope this extra detail provides rationale the information I am adding. The information is non-controversial.
I am also adding the Connected Contributor (paid) template.
Please note that Object Management Group (OMG) is a not-for-profit IT standards development organization that manages the Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ). Essentially, OMG and CISQ are the same entity.
Thank you! Tracie
Edit request
|
|---|
|
The Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ) [1] is an IT industry group comprising IT executives from the Global 2000, systems integrators, outsourced service providers, and software technology vendors committed to making improvements in the quality of IT application software[2] The mission of CISQ is to develop international standards to automate software quality measurement and to promote the development and sustainment of secure, reliable, and trustworthy software.[3] Through the work of CISQ, standards have been developed to measure software size[4][5], structural quality[6], and technical debt[7] from source code. Overview
Jointly organized by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie Mellon University and the Object Management Group (OMG), CISQ is designed to be a neutral forum in which customers and suppliers of IT application software can develop an industry-wide agenda of actions for defining, measuring, and improving IT software quality.[8][9] Software measurement standards are being developed by CISQ to help provide a foundation for focusing attention, setting quality targets, providing visibility, and tracking improvement progress[10]. By using violations of good architectural and coding practice as the basis for software quality measurement, development teams can learn from the results and avoid whole classes of weaknesses in future development. History
CISQ was launched in August 2009 by 24 founders including SEI and OMG.[2] The founders of CISQ are Paul D. Nielsen, Director and CEO of SEI and Richard Mark Soley, Chairman and CEO of OMG. Bill Curtis, the co-author of the CMM framework is CISQ's first Director. Software measurement and productivity expert Capers Jones is a CISQ Distinguished Advisor. In September 2012, CISQ published its standard measures for evaluating and benchmarking the reliability, security, performance efficiency, and maintainability of IT software.[11] In January 2013, OMG adopted Automated Function Point specifications.[12] In May 2013 CISQ reached 500 members.[13] In December 2013, WIPRO become the fourth major sponsor to join the list of industry participants investing in the completion and adoption of CISQ standards in the IT industry.[14] In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications[15]. In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification[16]. In January 2018, OMG adopted the Technical Debt specification[17]. In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto[18]. In April 2019, CISQ updated its Automated Source Code Quality Measures with embedded extensions[19]. In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019[20]. External links
References
|
TracieB1283 (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Reply 19-DEC-2019
[edit]- Thank you Tracie for your work reformatting the request, it is much appreciated.
- I previously stated that this last bit of formatting was all that was needed for the review to take place. Indeed, the review has now occurred; during that review, it was discovered that text from within the proposal was insufficiently paraphrased from the source material.
- Rest assured, this doesn't mean that the information won't be added — rather — it only means that the proposed text needs to be re-written.
- I understand that it can be frustrating carrying out all of this work, only to be told that additional work must then be performed. However, all text which is proposed for use in Wikipedia must be written using an editor's own words and phrases, per WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE.
- To that end, it is suggested that you rewrite the passages from the proposal which use cut and pasted text from the sources, so that only passages which are placed using your own words and phrases are included with the request. The information from the sources may still be used — but the way that information is presented here needs to be done in an original way — different from how the source authors worded and phrased it.
- You've indicated that there are incorrect items now in the article that certain parts of this text is meant to correct. Not wanting the article to go on listing any outright incorrect information while waiting for the re-write, please let me know if any items need to be changed immediately, and I will be happy to do so. Until then, I look forward to reviewing the properly paraphrased request which you may submit here at your earliest convenience.
Regards, Spintendo 11:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi Spintendo, for now, can we please re-name "Consortium for IT Software Quality" to "Consortium for Information and Software Quality"? Thank you. Is it possible to identify the areas of the article that are too closely written to the cited source? TracieB1283 (talk) 23:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Reply 7-JAN-2020
[edit]- Hi @TracieB1283: per WP:NAMECHANGES, I need to see sources which use the newer name. Please advise.
- This link will provide you with a list of texts from your recent proposals here on the talk page which were insufficiently paraphrased from the source material.[a]
- When ready to proceed with the name change references, kindly switch the
{{request edit}}template's answer parameter to read from|ans=yesto|ans=no. Thank you!
Regards, Spintendo 07:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Notes
Reply 14-JAN-2020
[edit]- Hi @Spintendo:, here are sources that reference CISQ's new name.
Announcing CISQ's New Name (blog) https://blog.it-cisq.org/2019/06/announcing-cisqs-new-name.html
CISQ - Object Management Group (PDF overview) http://www.omg.org/intro/CISQ.pdf
CISQ Launches State of the Nation on Software Quality Analysis (press release) https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/cisq-launches-state-of-the-nation-survey-on-software-quality-analysis-1028417783
Meanwhile, this week I will rewrite the mission of CISQ so it does not match the mission on the CISQ website (which lives here: www.it-cisq.org/overview)
Notes
TracieB1283 (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Edit request
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. |
Hi, I am requesting to make the page changes below. Thank you!
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
I am including the Connected Contributor (paid) template.
The Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ) is a not-for-profit IT industry leadership group whose members develop international standards to automate the measurement of software quality. The standard measures are used in software engineering and maintenance to reduce risk and cost. Members of CISQ are IT and business executives, software architects, software developers, software technology vendors, system integrators, and outsourced IT service providers committed to improving the quality of IT application software and software-intensive systems. Software measurement specifications developed by CISQ have been approved as international standards by the Object Management Group (OMG) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Overview
Jointly organized by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie Mellon University and the Object Management Group (OMG), CISQ is designed to be a neutral forum in which customers and suppliers of IT application software can develop an industry-wide agenda of actions for defining, measuring, and improving IT software quality.[1][2]. History
CISQ was launched in August 2009 by 24 founders including SEI and OMG.[3] The founders of CISQ are Paul D. Nielsen, Director and CEO of SEI and Richard Mark Soley, Chairman and CEO of OMG. Bill Curtis, the co-author of the CMM framework is CISQ's first Director. Software measurement and productivity expert Capers Jones is a CISQ Distinguished Advisor. In September 2012, CISQ published its standard measures for evaluating and benchmarking the reliability, security, performance efficiency, and maintainability of IT software.[4] In January 2013, OMG adopted the Automated Function Point specification.[5] In May 2013, CISQ reached 500 members.[6] In October 2015, OMG adopted Automated Source Code Quality Measure specifications[7]. In October 2016, OMG adopted the Automated Enhancement Point specification[8]. In January 2018, OMG adopted the Technical Debt specification[9]. In November 2018, CISQ published the Trustworthy Systems Manifesto[10]. In April 2019, CISQ updated the Automated Source Code Quality Measures[11]. In May 2019, ISO/IEC approved the OMG standard for Automated Function Points as ISO 19515:2019[12]. References
|
TracieB1283 (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Reply 3-FEB-2020
[edit]
Unable to review
- A verbatim description of the text to be removed has not been included with the request.[1]
- Reasons for making the changes have not been included with the request.[2]
Regards, Spintendo 20:41, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 30 December 2019.
Instructions for Submitters: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution.
- ^ "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 30 December 2019.
Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.