Other similar profiles
Explore more posts
-
Caden Damiano
The loudest voice in the room just cost your company six months. Kritarth Saurabh knows this pattern. As VP of Product at Neat, he walked me through a decision that looks rational on every slide deck but represents the most expensive mistake product teams make. A sales leader arrives with data—Mural sits in the top three whiteboarding apps, and six-figure deals hang on this integration. Product scrambles. Engineers build. Everyone celebrates the launch. Three weeks later, the next request arrives. Then another. Then twelve more. This was never about Mural. When Kritarth's team paused to validate instead of immediately building, they discovered the real problem: enterprises need workflow integration across their entire app ecosystem, not a point solution for one tool. That insight led Neat to build an App Hub marketplace instead. The difference? One approach creates an integration team that exists solely to service requests. The other creates a platform where apps onboard themselves. One scales linearly. The other exponentially. One requires a permanent headcount. The other requires infrastructure. Data justifies most decisions. Sales urgency validates them. Quarterly pressure accelerates them. But moving fast only matters when you scale the right thing. Kritarth articulates the shift: "You gotta have the conviction to take a step back and say, look, what is the real outcome that I'm trying to drive here?" The trap isn't the build—it's building before understanding. Output-driven roadmaps deliver features. Outcome-driven roadmaps deliver capability. Features create work. Capability creates leverage. What would you do? The Mural integration that would have shipped in eight weeks? Or the app marketplace took a quarter. The integration would have spawned a team servicing an infinite request queue, while the marketplace eliminated the queue entirely. The hardest word in product isn't "no"—it's "wait." Wait while we validate. Wait while we experiment. Wait while we understand whether we're solving a symptom or addressing the disease. Kritarth's framework from Escaping the Build Trap: define current state, articulate desired outcome, build hypothesis, run experiment, collect data, validate learning, then scale. Not ship and iterate. Validate then scale. The sequence matters because the cost of getting it wrong compounds. Five product teams can build the Mural integration. One product team can ask why the request exists in the first place. The difference is between output and outcome, between features and capability, between building a roadmap and validating one. Kritarth's episode releases in the next four weeks. Subscribe to www.wayofproduct.com to hear the full conversation.
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top contentOthers named Sri Vasamsetti
-
Ramya Sri Sushma Vasamsetti
-
Sri Ram Karthik Vasamsetti
-
Sri Durga VaraPrasad Vasamsetti
-
Divya Teja Sri Vasamsetti
40 others named Sri Vasamsetti are on LinkedIn
See others named Sri Vasamsetti