Skip to main content

Internet Archive will ignore robots.txt files to keep historical record accurate

Add as a preferred source on Google

The Internet Archive has announced that going forward, it will no longer conform to directives given by robots.txt files. These files are predominantly used to advise search engines on which portions of the page should be crawled and indexed to help facilitate search queries.

In the past, the Internet Archive has complied with instructions laid out by robots.txt files, according to a report from Boing Boing. However, it has been decided that the way that these files are calibrated is often at odds with the service that the site sets out to provide.

Recommended Videos

“Over time we have observed that the robots.txt files that are geared toward search engine crawlers do not necessarily serve our archival purposes,” stated a blog post that the organization published last week. “Internet Archive’s goal is to create complete ‘snapshots’ of web pages, including the duplicate content and the large versions of files.”

Robots.txt files are increasingly being used to remove entire domains from search engines following their transition from a live, accessible site to a parked domain. If a site goes out of business, and is rendered inaccessible in this way, it also becomes unavailable for viewing via the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. The organization apparently receives queries about these sites on a daily basis.

The Internet Archive hopes that disregarding robots.txt files will help contribute to an accurate representation of prior points in the web’s history, removing their capacity to muddy the waters with instructions intended for search engines.

The organization has already ceased referring to robots.txt files on sites and pages related to the U.S. government and the U.S. military, to account for the enormous changes that can be made to domains between one administration and the next. This decision has caused no major problems, so there are high hopes that discontinuing the use of the files more broadly will be helpful.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Google Earth’s AI misadventure lasted only a day. It was a tale of dangerous ignorance.
Nuclear reactors, tanks, and historical destruction on a life-like satellite map? Yeah, that's bad.
Nano Banana AI image generator representation.

Technology behemoths are clearly not reading the room, or they are just moving faster than they should when it comes to AI deployment. Google has already stuffed its Gemini AI in every corner of its software stack, from Android to daily productivity tools like Gmail that are used by hundreds of millions of users every day. AI is everywhere. Not all of it is bad, mind you. But in a few places, it just feels forced.

In its latest AI-fication experiment, the company targeted Google Earth. The idea was to let the audience use its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator and make images that can be placed on the map view. On paper, it's a cool idea. What would the Colosseum of Rome look like in your urban neighborhood? Yeah, fun stuff like that.

Read more
AMD is apparently gearing up to raise GPU prices right after Nvidia’s steep hike
AMD has reportedly told AIB partners about a price hike that goes into effect in. August.
AMD RX 7800

AMD is next in line to raise the asking price of its Radeon GPUs, merely days after the news of a similar hike coming for Nvidia graphics cards started making waves. As per ChannelGate on Weibo (h/t VideoCardz), AMD has informed its board partners that the price of GPU and memory bundles will go up by at least 10% in August.

Is a similar price hike coming for standalone graphics cards? I won't be surprised if that happens. The situation is so bad that AMD is planning to bring back graphics cards with 4GB of onboard memory. AMD just introduced the RX 9050 GPU, which costs $279. Notably, it's just $20 less than the RX 9060 XT that offers double the graphics memory.

Read more
Microsoft will make Windows work well with just 8GB RAM. We desperately need it
The dream of a reliable and affordable Windows laptop hinges on the next milestone at Microsoft.
Surface laptop on wooden table

The year 2026 has marked a huge course correction for Microsoft after years of frustrating users with plenty of confusing processes, unoptimized UI elements, and just the generous bloatware that can bring any Windows system to a crawl. Microsoft has finally shifted into a new phase. From fixing the right-click behavior to speeding up the Search system, the company has fixed plenty of papercuts.

The next major milestone is making Windows 11 run smoothly on Windows PCs with just 8GB of RAM. That directly means entry-level and budget laptops will at least get the basics right, even if that means sacrificing the on-device AI bells and whistles. Let's face it. The increasingly AI-first approach to computing on a Windows 11 machine is a little too taxing on the hardware at hand.

Read more