The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20200831055828/https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Python/pull/2291
Skip to content

/ Python

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update scoring_functions.py #2291

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from
Open

Update scoring_functions.py #2291

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@tanujdhiman
Copy link

tanujdhiman commented Aug 8, 2020 •
edited

We can find accuracy by manually if we are not going to use sklearn library.

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.
@tanujdhiman
Update scoring_functions.py
Verified
This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with a verified signature using GitHub’s key.
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23 Learn about signing commits
Loading status checks…
63b5618 
We can find accuracy by manually if we are not going to use sklearn library.
@TravisBuddy
Copy link

TravisBuddy commented Aug 8, 2020

Hey @tanujdhiman,
Something went wrong with the build.

TravisCI finished with status errored, which means the build failed because of something unrelated to the tests, such as a problem with a dependency or the build process itself.

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 1a44c980-d978-11ea-b7d0-872145514bcc
@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Aug 8, 2020

https://travis-ci.com/github/TheAlgorithms/Python/builds/178988952#L252
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants
@tanujdhiman @TravisBuddy @cclauss
You can’t perform that action at this time.