COPE provides leadership in thinking on publication ethics and practical resources to educate and support members, and offers a professional voice in current debates.
Our core practices
Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.
News & guidance
Is it acceptable to edit peer reviews and, if so, when? We shared a survey asking for your views. About 15% said they believed it is never acceptable for an editor to edit a peer reviewer’s comments and about 25% said they believed it is never acceptable to suppress a complete review.
We bring together support and guidance on issues that have come about during this crisis. The collection includes articles on how authors, editors and reviewers are handling their work during this period and guidelines developed in response to the changing environment and workflow.
Join us for our webinar on 7 August when we will hear from the Text Recycling Research Project team. They will give an overview of their research and discuss the ethical and practical issues involved in establishing effective policy
Read the latest publication ethics news with articles on diversity and inclusion, image fabrication, preprints and open access.
Addressing language and writing barriers were cited as major ethics issue faced by #Education journal editors in COPE's study. This group of editors also reported that detecting plagiarism and poor attribution standards was the most serious issue they faced and that issues around data and/or fabrication issues were those they felt least confident addressing.
What peer review means in the arts, humanities and social sciences: are there differences in gender and diversity issues in these disciplines from other disciplines? Read the discussion and add your views.
A case came to #C0PEForum: low risk study with no ethics committee approval. We share the advice given by #C0PEMembers and add to the discussion with further analysis and links to guidance relevant issues around retrospective ethics review.
Read the latest issues raised as cases with advice on how to go forward from #C0PEMembers: social media survey approval; ethics approval for survey design; failure to credit authors; bullying behaviour towards handling editor

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
