User talk:Oreocooke/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Oreocooke, for the period 2025 November-December. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The page Yasin Hacıoğlu has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

yeah ok Oreocooke (talk) 18:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

i am (still) not associated with any banned or blocked users, no matter what coincidental occurences occur. this has likely been went over previously, and if not, it has now. Oreocooke (talk) 20:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

@Oreocooke Just wanted to make sure, is this you? @Oreocookle: – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 03:07, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

@LuniZunie yes if not obvious by the it redirecting to my userpage and the {{doppelganger}} Oreocooke (talk) 03:33, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

@Oreocooke Anybody can create a redirect to any page if they know what they are doing (as in an LTA). Better to be safe than sorry =) – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 03:35, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kris's pronouns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris's pronouns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🫀 Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?) 04:31, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Oreocooke, what prompted you to created that dab page? You seem to be very interested in participating in WP:XFD and in the Project namespace in general which is cool, so it's a bit strange that you created such an obviously unnecessary dab page.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 07:41, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bait30 something someone said in the rfd organhaver mentioned Oreocooke (talk) 08:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

What rfd?  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 16:34, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

I'll remember later Oreocooke (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

I'm actually curious what you mean here. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?) 00:40, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Can you please explain what you're referring to? Even Organhaver doesn't know what you're talking about.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 23:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for attending Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/November 2025. It was a pleasure meeting you and your family member again. I hope you continue to contribute to Wikipedia, even though this can be a difficult place at times. Hopefully see you again in the future. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 00:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Oreocooke,

Just a reminder to you that if an editor asks for you to not post messaes on their User talk page or not to ping them or send them messages, please honor that request. I'm sure if you had this feeling about another editor, you would like that editor to honor your request to leave you alone.

If you have questions about civility and norms on Wikipedia, there is no better place to discuss it than the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

@Liz what Oreocooke (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Pppery delete your comment on their User talk page and made it clear they don't want to discuss things with you and despite that, and my note here, you went back and posted on their User talk page again. If I were you, I'd delete that comment and keep yourself busy working with other editors who you are on better terms with. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Oreocooke,

Please do not tag drafts and sandboxes CSD G13 for speedy deletion. Most editors don't get this tagging correct (6 months since the last human edit, including time zone changes) and we have bots that do a really reliable job at doing this (see hourly reports like User:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts). When human editors get this time counting wrong, we then have to wait another 6 months until the drafts are eligible for G13 deletion again so it can be a mess.

Feel free to tag articles with other appropriate CSD criteria but please leave G13 tagging to the bots like User:DreamRimmer bot II to handle. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

ok

but as a sidenote i did double-check it had been at least six months since the page was last edited, and when a page was very close but not there yet i literally set an alarm Oreocooke (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

one of the few times when i make an intentional error. rather a bad title than no title. Oreocooke (talk) 00:55, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Oreocooke,

Please stop making versions of the Main Page of Wikipedia. You have no reason to create these pages, much less moving them around to different page titles, they are only being created because I assume you are bored. One day, an admin who is less patient than I will take issues with your activity and issue a block. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liz (talk • contribs) 03:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

what are you talking about Oreocooke (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

actually if this is about that thing you could've worded it better Oreocooke (talk) 03:20, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Please also stop making edits like this change that mess with template parameters. The parameter you removed was not superfluous - it changed what article the template links to. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:09, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

for those changes I usually check if it changes the link but I guess I forgot to that time Oreocooke (talk) 19:10, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

and also it seems the issue i was trying to fix became fixed anyway so at least i won't think i'll have to replace it anymore Oreocooke (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

at around 19:25, 1 December 2025 (UTC) i was logged out on everything and i have no idea why Oreocooke (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Oreocooke. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! ~2025-31245-28 (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 18:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments, as you did to 0.9. Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with civility and refrain from making personal attacks. It's hard to think of an acceptable reason why you added the edit summary "men kissing" for this revision.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 05:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Category:Rosstat November 2025 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oreocooke (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Template:Db-selfuser has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The redirect 20 de octubre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 10 § 20 de octubre until a consensus is reached. Sugar Tax (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Template:User nospace, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User nospace and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User nospace during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sugar Tax (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Template:User nospace has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sugar Tax (talk) 17:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Template:Approximate track gauge metric has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/today requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:16, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

The page Disambiguagtion has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. – bradv 18:20, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Category:Pages using unorthodox archives has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sugar Tax (talk) 18:27, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry if I sounded curt when I responded to your deletion message; I created that page a long time ago and didn't know the attribution rules for copying text within Wikipedia. Generally if you see a page like that (a copy within Wikipedia, or clearly taken from another freely-licensed source), and it doesn't qualify for deletion for any other reason, you should just add the attribution template yourself. Also, since you've already been warned about this, please stop "poaching" subpages of other users; it is very strange and not standard practice. If you see a stale draft in somebody else's userspace that looks promising, you're welcome to just edit it where it sits, although you shouldn't do this without the other editor's permission unless they have been inactive for ages. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:26, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

@Passengerpigeon the attribution isn't really done with a template. you just put it in the edit summary. i did something like that with Draft:MP-68, which i fixed up, translated, and some small other stuff in addition to the whole attributing part Oreocooke (talk) 01:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Also, just so you know you have my permission to work on translating that and User:Passengerpigeon/RENFE Class 597 if you want. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

@Passengerpigeon it can be a cooperative thing if we let it be Oreocooke (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

can you put the xfdcloser stuff together and separate the stuff before it from the stuff after it and whatever Oreocooke (talk) 02:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

update: I did it. btw the reason I asked to put the xfdcloser stuff together and whatever is because the discussions on 24 October were larger than all other discussions in October 2025 combined. Oreocooke (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

after I fix archive 4 (remove the weird duplicate discussions) I probably won't be touching the archives for a boutwo weeks because I won't archive any more until 2026 Oreocooke (talk) 17:12, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

ok that's done. and also confirming now the next archive will be archive 5 covering everything else in 2024 (that is, November and December of 2025), and it will be done at the beginning of 2026 Oreocooke (talk) 17:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Commandant Quacks-a-lot was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It needs More inline citations. Even if it's the same articles your referencing, you need WP:ILC's to show that. Also, check out WP:REFNAME; it might be helpful. Best of luck!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MP-68 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Oreocooke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on ASSASN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sugar Tax (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Year 2068 problem has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 20 § Year 2068 problem until a consensus is reached. Vestrian24Bio 13:16, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I can't comprehend this G3 decline. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:32, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@LaundryPizza03 i don't remember doing that Oreocooke (talk) 06:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)