Summary
Empowerment theory need not remain a mystery. Efforts, such as those described in this special section, to outline more clearly the nomological network of empowerment at multiple levels of analysis will advance empowerment theory. Tough-minded rigorous research is needed to advance the concept of empowerment. Empowerment research requires us to shift our attention from a debate between the merits of research at one level of analysis versus another to building bridges between levels of analysis. We must integrate theories and methods from other disciplines and develop research strategies that incorporate qualitative procedures and the voices of the research participants. The papers in this special section take aim on these tasks and add to our understanding of empowerment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burgess, L. (1990). A block association president's perspective on citizen participation.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 159–162.
Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–82.
Glidewell, J. C. (1970).Choice points. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaye, G. (1990). A community organizer's perspective.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 151–158.
Kieffer, C. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 9–36.
Levine, M. (1980). Investigative reporting as a research method: An analysis of Bernstein's & Woodward's “All the President's Men.”American Psychologist, 35, 626–638.
Maton, K. I., & Rappaport, J. (1984). Empowerment in a religious setting: A multivariate investigation.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 37–72.
Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83–116.
Prestby, J. E., Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., & Chavis, D. (1990). Benefits, costs, incentive management and participation in voluntary organizations: A means to understanding and promoting empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 117–150.
Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1–7.
Sue, S., & Zane, N. (1980). Learned helplessness theory and Community Psychology. In M. S. Gibbs, J. R. Lachenmeyer, & J. Sigal (Eds.),Community psychology: Theoretical and empirical approaches (pp. 121–143). New York: Gardner.
Van Uchelen, C. (1989, June).Healing mechanisms of self-help: Toward a non-individualistic conception of control. Paper presented at the Second Biennial Conference on Community Research and Action, East Lansing, MI.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Empowerment: Forging new perspectives in mental health. In J. Rappaport, & E. Seidman, (Eds.),Handbook of community psychology, New York: Plenum Press.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment.Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71–86.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen particpation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank Abraham Wandersman and Deborah Salem for their thoughful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmerman, M.A. Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. Am J Commun Psychol 18, 169–177 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922695
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922695