Why is Blake Lively lawsuit trending? Because the 2026 legal fight with Justin Baldoni finally ended. It closed with a settlement, no payout to Lively, and a small fee award.
Here’s the surprise. Lively asked for roughly $8 million in legal fees. Judge Lewis Liman awarded about $407,000, close to 5% of that request.
Liman called her billed hours unreasonable. Baldoni’s lawyer called the result a significant victory for his clients. Lively’s lawyers called it a historic first under California law.
This guide covers the ruling, the settlement, the timeline, and what happens next. You’ll get every date, dollar amount, and court order in plain English.
Why Is the Blake Lively Lawsuit Trending in 2026?
Judge Lewis Liman issued the final money ruling on August 26, 2026. That order pushed the case back into search results after a quieter summer.
Interest has spiked at every stage this year. Unsealed texts arrived in January, dismissals in April, and a settlement in May.
Confusion drives searches too. Some readers assume Lively is the defendant. She filed first, and Baldoni countersued.
As of late September 2026, that fee order is the newest ruling reported. No trial or appeal is pending in the main case.
| Trigger | Date |
|---|---|
| Exhibits unsealed | January 2026 |
| 10 of 13 claims dismissed | April 2, 2026 |
| Settlement announced | May 4, 2026 |
| Fee entitlement ruling | June 12, 2026 |
| Settlement terms made public | June 15, 2026 |
| Fee amount ruling | August 26, 2026 |
What Was the Blake Lively Lawsuit About?
Lively accused Justin Baldoni of harassment on the set of It Ends With Us. She then claimed his team ran a smear campaign after she complained.
Her lawsuit named Baldoni and producer Jamey Heath over alleged harassment on set. Baldoni denied every claim. His lawyers said the fight was about creative control.
The film opened in August 2024 and became a commercial hit. The off-screen feud grew louder than the movie.
Lively’s complaint described several specific behaviors:
- Questions about her sex life and personal life
- A graphic scene she says was added without her consent
- Entries into her trailer while she was undressed
- Pressure to simulate nudity she says was outside the script
Those were allegations. Baldoni disputed them, and no jury ever heard them.
| Filing | Date | Where |
|---|---|---|
| California Civil Rights Department complaint | December 20, 2024 | California |
| Lively federal lawsuit | December 31, 2024 | Southern District of New York |
| Baldoni countersuit | January 16, 2025 | Southern District of New York |
Is the Blake Lively Lawsuit Over?
Yes, the case is over. The August fee ruling closed the last open issue.
Both sides agreed to follow Liman’s fee ruling and not appeal it. Lively had already settled her remaining claims on May 4, 2026.
A few side disputes involving publicists ran separately. One example is a Texas appeal filed in May 2026 by consultant Jed Wallace.
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| Lively’s remaining claims | Settled May 4, 2026 |
| Baldoni’s $400 million suit | Dismissed June 2025 |
| Fee motion | Decided August 26, 2026 |
| Appeals on the fee ruling | Waived |
| Jury trial | Never held |
Key Takeaway: The case peaked in 2026, and the final court order landed on August 26.
Did Blake Lively Win the Lawsuit Against Justin Baldoni?
Neither side won cleanly, and both camps claim victory. Lively lost most of her claims and collected no settlement money. Baldoni lost his $400 million suit and owes her fees.
Think of it like a boxing match with no knockout. Both fighters left bruised, and both told reporters they won.
Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, stressed that Lively got only 5% of her fee request. Her lawyers, Esra Hudson and Michael Gottlieb, said retaliatory suits carry real consequences. They called the fee award historic, the first under that California law.
| Side | Wins | Losses |
|---|---|---|
| Lively | Baldoni’s suit dismissed; about $407,000 in fees; joint statement saying her concerns deserved to be heard | 10 of 13 claims dismissed; no settlement money; punitive damages denied |
| Baldoni | Harassment claims dismissed; fee award far below the request; no settlement payout | $400 million suit dismissed; ordered to pay fees |
How Much Did Blake Lively Get in the Settlement?
Lively received no money in the May 2026 settlement. Reports confirmed she received no compensation on her remaining claims. Her filings once sought about $550 million in total damages.
Her only recovery came later, from the fee ruling. That award was about $407,000.
Many readers ask who can claim money. Nobody can. Consider these facts:
- This was a private lawsuit, not a class action.
- There is no claim form, no eligible class, and no public payout.
- Only the named parties received or paid anything.
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Settlement payment to Lively | $0 |
| Fees requested | $7.5 to $8 million (reports vary) |
| Fees awarded | About $363,000 |
| Court costs awarded | About $44,000 |
| Total awarded | About $407,000 |
| Punitive and treble damages | Denied |
Blake Lively Attorneys’ Fees Ruling: What the Judge Decided
Judge Liman ordered Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios to pay about $407,000 of Lively’s legal costs. That breaks down to $363,000 in fees and $44,000 in court costs.
The judge said her lawyers’ billing rates were not unreasonable. He found the hours claimed were. He also rejected fees for media relations and some travel.
The award covers only work tied to defending against Baldoni’s defamation claim. Lively’s other legal costs were not part of it.
In June, the judge had denied her request for triple and punitive damages. He suggested she was trying to sidestep a jury trial.
| Date | Ruling |
|---|---|
| June 12, 2026 | Fees allowed; punitive and treble damages denied |
| August 26, 2026 | Amount set at about $407,000 |
Key Takeaway: Lively won a fee award of about $407,000, but no damages and no settlement money.
Blake Lively Lawsuit Timeline for 2026
The 2026 timeline runs from unsealed exhibits in January to a fee order in August. Each step narrowed the case until only a fee fight remained.
Trial was first set for March 9. The judge moved it to May 18 because criminal trials take priority.
The February settlement conference failed. Then the April dismissals reshaped everything, and a deal followed two weeks before trial.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| January 2026 | Hundreds of exhibits unsealed, including texts and depositions |
| February 11, 2026 | Court-ordered settlement conference ends without a deal |
| April 2, 2026 | Liman dismisses 10 of 13 Lively claims |
| May 4, 2026 | Lively and Wayfarer announce a settlement |
| May 7, 2026 | Notice of settlement filed; judge signs off |
| May 18, 2026 | Original trial date, never held |
| June 12, 2026 | Judge allows fees, denies punitive and treble damages |
| June 15, 2026 | Settlement terms made public |
| August 26, 2026 | Fee award of about $407,000 |
Which Blake Lively Claims Were Dismissed in April 2026?
Judge Liman dismissed 10 of Lively’s 13 claims on April 2, 2026. That included her sexual harassment claims and removed Baldoni personally from the case.
He gave three main reasons:
- California law did not apply, since the conduct happened elsewhere and she doesn’t live there.
- As an independent contractor, she couldn’t sue under Title VII.
- Several allegations fell short of a hostile work environment.
The judge said Lively held control over the film far beyond a typical employee. He also said actors need room to experiment within an agreed script.
Three claims survived. They targeted Wayfarer and the publicists, not Baldoni personally.
| Claim | Result |
|---|---|
| Sexual harassment | Dismissed |
| Claims against Baldoni personally | Dismissed |
| Retaliation against Wayfarer | Survived |
| Breach of contract against Wayfarer | Survived |
| Aiding and abetting retaliation (PR defendants) | Survived |
What Happened to Justin Baldoni’s $400 Million Countersuit?
A federal judge dismissed Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit in June 2025. He had sued Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and publicist Leslie Sloane for extortion, defamation, and invasion of privacy.
Liman ruled that Lively’s allegations were legally protected as part of a legal proceeding. Litigation privilege works like a shield. Statements made in court filings are hard to sue over.
Baldoni could have refiled a few contract claims. His team chose not to, and final judgment followed in October 2025.
His earlier $250 million suit against The New York Times was withdrawn in California. He then added the paper as a defendant in the New York case. The Times later sought about $150,000 in legal fees.
| Detail | Info |
|---|---|
| Amount claimed | $400 million |
| Filed | January 16, 2025 |
| Defendants | Lively, Reynolds, Sloane, The New York Times |
| Dismissed | June 2025 |
| Final judgment | October 2025 |
Key Takeaway: Most claims on both sides were dismissed before any jury heard a single word.
What Is California Civil Code Section 47.1?
Section 47.1 is a 2023 California law shielding accusers from retaliatory defamation suits. Its formal name is the Protecting Survivors from Weaponized Defamation Lawsuits Act.
The law protects good-faith communications about sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination. Lively used it to seek fees, triple damages, and punitive damages.
The judge granted fees only. Freedman said the law is imperfect but important. He added that his clients left the ruling without appeal rights so the law couldn’t be overturned.
Lively’s team celebrated the result as a first-of-its-kind award. Legal observers will watch how other courts apply it.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Passed | 2023 |
| Protects | Good-faith reports of harassment, assault, discrimination |
| Remedy used here | Attorneys’ fees and costs |
| Remedy denied | Treble and punitive damages |
| Appeal on this ruling | Waived by both sides |
What Are the Blake Lively Settlement Terms?
The settlement ends all claims between the parties and bars future suits over the dispute. The terms became public on June 15, 2026.
The deal came after months of failed talks. It was first confidential, and no money changed hands.
The joint statement admitted the process brought challenges. It said Lively’s concerns deserved to be heard. Both sides pledged to support workplaces free of improprieties.
The deal left one loose end. Lively’s fee motion stayed alive, and both sides agreed to accept the ruling.
| Term | Detail |
|---|---|
| Announced | May 4, 2026 |
| Court approval | May 7, 2026 |
| Payment to Lively | None |
| Future claims | Barred |
| Fee motion | Left for the judge to decide |
| Appeals on fee ruling | Waived |
Who Were the Defendants in the Blake Lively Lawsuit?
Lively sued Justin Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, and several publicists. Her complaint also named Jamey Heath, Steve Sarowitz, Melissa Nathan, Jennifer Abel, and The Agency Group PR.
She later added consultant Jed Wallace. That claim was dismissed in November 2025, removing him from the case.
Baldoni’s countersuit had its own targets. It named Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and her publicist Leslie Sloane.
Who was sued in Lively’s case:
- Justin Baldoni, director and co-star
- Wayfarer Studios, the production company
- Jamey Heath, Wayfarer president
- Steve Sarowitz, Wayfarer co-founder
- Publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel
- The Agency Group PR
Key Takeaway: Section 47.1 produced the only payout, and the settlement closed every other claim.
What Role Did Taylor Swift’s Texts Play in the Case?
Taylor Swift’s texts were unsealed in January 2026, but she never became a party. Her representatives said she had no role in the film’s production.
Baldoni subpoenaed Swift in May 2025. The subpoena was withdrawn after the court criticized it. A judge did allow him to obtain her texts with Lively.
The unsealed pages fueled weeks of headlines. They showed friendly banter, film strategy talk, and strain in a friendship.
Those texts never reached a jury. Still, they explain why the case stayed viral.
| Unsealed item | Why it drew attention |
|---|---|
| Lively and Swift texts | Showed Swift’s support and later friction |
| Sony executive messages | Revealed private criticism of Lively’s conduct |
| Reynolds messages | Showed his push for agents to back Lively |
| Deposition excerpts | Included cast and crew accounts |
Who Is Judge Lewis Liman in the Blake Lively Case?
Judge Lewis J. Liman is the U.S. District Judge in Manhattan who handled both cases. He sits in the Southern District of New York.
He set the schedule, moved the trial, and wrote every major ruling. He also denied Lively’s early gag order request.
His tone matters here. He struck a 300-page deposition filing as a bid to invite public scandal. He also cut through the Swift subpoena drama.
| Date | Liman action |
|---|---|
| February 2025 | Denied Lively’s gag order request |
| June 2025 | Dismissed Baldoni’s $400 million suit |
| August 2025 | Struck Lively’s deposition from the record |
| April 2, 2026 | Dismissed 10 of 13 Lively claims |
| June 12, 2026 | Allowed fees, denied damages |
| August 26, 2026 | Set fees at about $407,000 |
Can Justin Baldoni or Blake Lively Appeal Now?
No, both sides gave up the right to appeal the fee ruling. Freedman said Baldoni left the Section 47.1 ruling without appellate rights on purpose.
Lively dismissed her remaining claims with the settlement. The deal also bars new claims over the same dispute.
Think of it like locking a door and tossing the key. Neither side can walk back through.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Can Baldoni appeal the fee award? | No, waived |
| Can Lively refile dismissed claims? | No, barred |
| Can Lively seek more damages? | No, denied and waived |
| Is a trial still coming? | No |
Watch for two things next. Payment of the fee award is one. The other is how courts apply Section 47.1 in future cases.
Key Takeaway: The main case has no trial, no appeal, and no open claims left.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the Blake Lively lawsuit trending right now?
A judge set her attorneys’ fee award at about $407,000 on August 26, 2026.
That ruling closed the last open issue in the case.
Coverage of the settlement and unsealed texts keeps searches high.
How much money did Blake Lively get from Justin Baldoni?
She received no money in the May 2026 settlement.
She was later awarded about $407,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs.
She had requested roughly $8 million.
Did the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni case go to trial?
No, the case settled two weeks before the May 18, 2026 trial date.
A judge had already dismissed most of Lively’s claims in April.
Baldoni’s $400 million suit was dismissed in June 2025.
Who paid Blake Lively’s attorneys’ fees?
Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios were ordered to pay them.
The award covers work tied to defending Baldoni’s dismissed defamation claim.
It was granted under California Civil Code Section 47.1.
Can I join or file a claim in the Blake Lively lawsuit?
No, this was a private lawsuit, not a class action.
There is no claim form, no eligible class, and no public payout.
The case is settled, so nothing remains open to join.
The main takeaway is simple. The case ended with no trial, no settlement payout, and a $407,000 fee award. Both sides claimed victory, and both had a point.
Want to follow cases like this one? Court dockets and major news outlets show each new order first.
Bookmark this page and check back if a new filing appears.
