Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability

• Angus, D. (Ed.) (1985).The best short stories of the modern age (rev. ed.). New York: Fawcett Premier.

  Google Scholar 

• Arbuckle, T. Y., &Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 126–131.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bain, C. E., Beaty, J., &Hunter, J. P. (1986).The Norton introduction to literature (4th ed.). New York: Norton.

  Google Scholar 

• Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., &Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 610–632.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, R. L., &Bickhard, M. H. (1986).Knowing levels and developmental stages. New York: Karger.

  Google Scholar 

• Costermans, J., Lories, G., &Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 142–150.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cull, W. L., &Zechmeister, E. B. (1994). The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners?Memory & Cognition,22, 249–257.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dunlosky, J., &Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments for learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.Memory & Cognition,20, 374–380.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dunlosky, J., &Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur?Journal of Memory & Language,33, 545–565.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dunlosky, J., & Schwartz, B. L. (1995, November).Does relational information affect people’s predictions of eventual free recall? Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.

• Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., &Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 430–445.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glenberg, A. M., &Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 702–718.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glenberg, A. M., &Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension.Memory & Cognition,15, 84–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., &Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 119–136.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., &Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension.Memory & Cognition,10, 597–602.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glover, J. A. (1989). Improving readers’ estimates of learning from text: The role of inserted questions.Reading Research Quarterly,28, 68–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience.Journal of Educational Psychology,56, 208–216.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992).Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kearney, E. M., &Zechmeister, E. B. (1989). Judgments of item difficulty by good and poor associative learners.American Journal of Psychology,102, 365–383.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kelemen, W. L., &Weaver, C. A., III (1997). Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1394–1409.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., &Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice.American Journal of Psychology,93, 329–343.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kirk, R. E. (1995).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

  Google Scholar 

• Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility account of the feeling of knowing.Psychological Review,100, 609–639.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Koriat, A. (1994). Metamemory’s knowledge of its own knowledge: The accessibility account of the feeling of knowing. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 311–333.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koriat, A. (1997, November).Practice improves resolution but impairs calibration: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.

• Krinsky, R., &Nelson, T. O. (1985). The feeling of knowing for different types of retrieval failure.Acta Psychologica,58, 141–158.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Leonesio, R. J., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 464–470.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 756–766.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., &Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments.Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 114–121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maki, R. H. (1998). Metacomprehension of text: Influence of absolute confidence level on bias and accuracy. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 223–248). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Maki, R. H., &Berry, S. L. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 663–679.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maki, R. H., Foley, J. M., Kajer, W. K., Thompson, R. C., &Willert, M. G. (1990). Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 609–616.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., &Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 126–129.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maki, R. H., &Serra, M. (1992). The basis of test predictions for text material.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 116–126.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maki, R. H., &Swett, S. (1987). Metamemory for narrative text.Memory & Cognition,15, 72–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., &Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 851–861.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Metcalfe, J., &Shimamura, A. P. (1994).Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O. (1988). Predictive accuracy of the feeling of knowing across different criterion tasks and across different subject populations and individuals. In M. M. Gruenberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 190–196). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O. (1992).Metacognition: Core readings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O. (1996a). Consciousness and metacognition.American Psychologist,51, 102–116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O. (1996b). Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance of an individual item.Applied Cognitive Psychology,10, 257–260.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., &Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed-JOL effect.”Psychological Science,2, 267–270.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., &Dunlosky, J. (1994). Norms of paired-associate recall during multitrial learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents.Memory,2, 325–335.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., White, D. M., Steinberg, J., Townes, B. D., &Anderson, D. (1990). Cognition and metacognition at extreme altitudes on Mount Everest.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 367–374.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Landwehr, R. S., &Narens, L. (1986). A comparison of three predictors of an individual’s memory performance: The individual’s feeling of knowing versus normative feeling of knowing versus base-rate item difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 279–287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Shimamura, A. P., Landwehr, R. S., &Narens, L. (1982). Overlearning and the feeling of knowing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 279–288.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., McSpadden, M., Fromme, K., &Marlatt, G. A. (1986). Effects of alcohol intoxication on metamemory and on retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 247–254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 338–368.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76 (1, Pt. 2).

• Patton, J. H., Weaver, C. A., III, Burns, K. D., Brady, M. D., & Bryant, D. S. (1991, April).Cognitive impulsivity and cognitive skills. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, New Orleans.

• Pressley, M., &Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text.Educational Psychologist,25, 19–33.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M., Ghatala, E. S., Woloshyn, V., &Pirie, J. (1990). Sometimes adults miss the main idea and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple-choice comprehension questions.Reading Research Quarterly,25, 232–249.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., &Ghatala, E. S. (1984). Memory strategy monitoring in adults and children.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 270–288.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M., Snyder, B. L., Levin, J. R., Murray, H. G., &Ghatala, E. S. (1987). Perceived readiness for examination performance (PREP) produced by initial reading of text and text containing adjunct questions.Reading Research Quarterly,22, 219–236.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rabinowitz, J. C., Ackerman, B. P., Craik, F. I. M., &Hinchley, J. L. (1982). Aging and metamemory: The roles of relatedness and imagery.Journal of Gerontology,37, 688–695.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Reder, L. M. (1996).Implicit memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Reder, L. M., &Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Schneider, W. (1988).Micro Experimental Laboratory (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh: Psychological Software Tools.

  Google Scholar 

• Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., &Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist?Journal of Educational Psychology,87, 433–444.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schraw, G., Potenza, M., &Nebelsick-Gullet, L. (1993). Constraints on the calibration of performance.Contemporary Educational Psychology,18, 455–463.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schraw, G., &Roedel, T. D. (1994). Test difficulty and judgment bias.Memory & Cognition,22, 63–69.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 357–375.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwartz, B. L., &Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 93–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Slife, B. D., &Weaver, C. A., III. (1992). Depression, cognitive skill, and metacognitive skill in problem solving.Cognition & Emotion,6, 1–22.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spellman, B. A., &Bjork, R. A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess.Psychological Science,3, 315–316.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thiede, K. W., &Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students’ metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 290–302.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, W. B., &Mason, S. E. (1996). Instability of individual differences in the association between confidence judgments and memory performance.Memory & Cognition,24, 226–234.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Underwood, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,71, 673–679.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Walczyk, J. J., &Hall, V. C. (1989). Is the failure to monitor comprehension an instance of cognitive impulsivity?Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 294–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weaver, C. A., III (1990). Constraining factors in calibration of comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 214–222.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weaver, C. A., III, &Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.Memory & Cognition,23, 12–22.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weaver, C. A., III,Bryant, D. S., &Burns, K. D. (1995). Comprehension monitoring: Extensions of the Kintsch and van Dijk model. In C. A. Weaver, III, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.),Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 177–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Weaver, C. A., III, &Kelemen, W. L. (1997). Judgments of learning at delays: Shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy?Psychological Science,8, 318–321.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wellman, H. M. (1978). Knowledge of the interaction of memory variables: A developmental study of metamemory.Developmental Psychology,14, 24–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wright, D. B. (1996). Measuring feeling of knowing.Applied Cognitive Psychology,10, 261–268.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yates, J. F. (1990).Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Yussen, S. R., &Levy, V. M. (1975). Developmental changes in predicting one’s own span of short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,19, 502–508.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references