Hostname: page-component-66d9dcfd78-9tvqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-02T06:35:48.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing theories of institutional change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

CHRISTOPHER KINGSTON  and
GONZALO CABALLERO
CHRISTOPHER KINGSTON*
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
GONZALO CABALLERO
Affiliation:
University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
*
*Email: cgkingston@amherst.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article compares a variety of theoretical approaches to conceptualizing institutional change. Our goal is neither to discover the ‘best’ theory, nor to attempt to build a new one. Rather, we wish to compare how the theories we consider agree or differ with respect to the causes, process, and outcomes of institutional change. Some of the theories we discuss emphasize the deliberate creation of institutions through the political process, while others emphasize the spontaneous emergence of institutions through evolutionary processes. Still others combine elements of evolution and design. We differentiate a variety of approaches to conceptualizing the interaction between formal and informal rules. We discuss recent theories based on the ‘Equilibrium View’ of institutions, and theories emphasizing the role of habit, learning, and bounded rationality. We also consider theoretical explanations for institutional inertia and path-dependence.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 151 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2005), ‘The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth’, American Economic Review, 95 (3): 546–579.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alchian, A. (1950), ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3): 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, L. (1996), ‘Empirical Work in Institutional Economics: An Overview’, in Alston, L., Eggertsson, T., and North, D. (eds.), Empirical Studies in Institutional Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001), Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2007), ‘Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Ayres, C. C. (1944), The Theory of Economic Progress, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (2004), Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions and Evolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. and Naidu, S. (2006), ‘Persistent Institutions’, working paper, Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Brette, O. (2003), ‘Thorstein Veblen's Theory of Institutional Change: Beyond Technological Determinism’, European Journal of Economic Thought, 10 (3): 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brousseau, E. and Raynaud, E. (2008), ‘Climbing the Hierarchical, Ladders of Rules: The Dynamics of Institutional Frameworks’, working paper, Economix, University of Paris Quest La Défense.Google Scholar
Caballero, G. (2008), ‘El cambio institucional de la economía española del franquismo a la democracia: un análisis histórico institucional’, Política y Gobierno, V. XV (2): 353–401.Google Scholar
Calvert, R. (1995), ‘Rational Actors, Equilibrium and Social Institutions’, in Knight, J. and Sened, I. (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. J. (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, R. (1993), ‘Against Legal Centrism’, California Law Review, 81 (1): 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. P. (1994), ‘Why Are Institutions the “Carriers of History”’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (2): 205–220.Google Scholar
David, P. P. (2007), ‘Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for “Historical Economics”’, in Hodgson, G. M. (ed.), The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader, Edward Elgar, pp. 120–142.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, T. (1996), ‘No Experiments, Monumental Disasters: Why It Took a Thousand Years to Develop a Specialized Fishing Industry in Iceland’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. (1991), Order without Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. (2006), Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. and Laitin, D. (2004), ‘A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change’, American Political Science Review, 98 (4): 633–652.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. F. (1973), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. G. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. G. (2006), ‘What Are Institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. G. (2007), ‘The Revival of Veblenian Institutional Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 16 (2): 325–340.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. G. and Knudsen, T. (2006), ‘Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16: 343–366.Google Scholar
Kandori, M. (1992), ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’, Review of Economic Studies, 59: 63–80.Google Scholar
Kantor, S. S. (1998), Politics and Property Rights: The Closing of the Open Range in the Postbellum South, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, B. B. (2007), ‘The Institutional Economics of John R. Commons: Complement and Substitute for Neoclassical Economic Theory’, Socio-Economic Review, 5: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, C. (2007), ‘Marine Insurance in Britain and America, 1720–1844: A Comparative Institutional Analysis’, Journal of Economic History, 67 (2): 379–409.Google Scholar
Knight, J. (1995), ‘Models, Interpretations and Theories: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change’, in Knight, J. and Sened, I. (eds.), Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Knudsen, T. (2007), ‘Organizational Routines in Evolutionary Theory’, for The Handbook of Organizational Routines, edited by Markus Becker, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=997439.Google Scholar
Levi, M. (1990), ‘A Logic of Institutional Change’, in Schweers, K. and Levi, M. (eds.), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Libecap, G. G. (1989), Contracting for Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., North, D., and Weingast, B. (1990), ‘The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs’, Economics and Politics, 1: 1–23.Google Scholar
Myerson, R. (2004), ‘Justice, Institutions, and Multiple Equilibria’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 5: 91–107.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2005), Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pagano, U. (2007), ‘Bounded Rationality and Institutionalism’, in Hodgson, G. M. (ed.), The Evolution of Economic Institutions: A Critical Reader, Edward Elgar, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (2004), ‘Understanding Insitutional Change: Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4): 109–131.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. (1994), Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttan, V. V. (2006), ‘Social Science Knowledge and Induced Institutional Innovation: An Institutional Design Perspective’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 2 (3): 249–272.Google Scholar
Schotter, A. (1981), The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1989), ‘Spontaneous Order’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (4): 85–97.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. and Fayle, C. E. (1928), A History of Lloyd's, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Young, H. H. (1996), ‘The Economics of Convention’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105–122.Google Scholar