Advertisement

AnyViewer vs CryptoTerm

Compared by Fileion editors from each app’s page · Updated

AnyViewer by AOMEI FreeWindows · Android · iOS · Mac

CryptoTerm by JT-Soft PaidWindows

Key differences

  • Only AnyViewer runs on Android, iOS and Mac.
  • AnyViewer is free; CryptoTerm is paid.
  • Both run on Windows.
Advertisement

Side by side

DetailAnyViewerCryptoTerm
Basics
Publisher AOMEIJT-Soft
License FreePaid
Slogan Control anything, from anywhereYour Universal Gateway to Secure Systems.
Platforms
WindowsSame ✓ Yes✓ Yes
Mac ✓ Yes— No
Android ✓ Yes— No
iOS ✓ Yes— No
Latest version on Fileion
Windows 5.6.0 · 64.7 MB2.92 · 9.7 MB
Mac 3.6.0 · 36.2 MB—
Android 4.0 · 40.4 MB—
iOS 4.0.0—
On Fileion
Key features 208
FAQs answered 1118

No user ratings or download counts here until review and download data are reliable.

Key features

AnyViewer20 features

  • Cross-platform access
  • Fast and stable connections
  • Multiple monitor support
  • High-quality display
  • Unattended access
  • Black screen mode
  • Remote input control
  • Auto-lock screen
  • + 12 more
All AnyViewer features →

CryptoTerm8 features

  • Unified Session & Transfer Management
  • Legacy System Support
  • Credential Vault
  • Session Recovery
  • Custom Keyboard Mapping
  • Batch Scripting & Automation
  • Connection Dashboard
  • Drag-and-Drop File Transfers
All CryptoTerm features →

Pros and cons

AnyViewer

Pros

  • Quick and easy setup process
  • Smooth performance on most networks
  • Strong encryption ensures secure sessions
  • Secure connections with various encryption options
  • Supports unattended remote access

Cons

  • No support for macOS or Linux
  • Free plan limits speed and devices
  • Lacks advanced enterprise-level features
  • Mobile connections may drop occasionally
  • File transfers can be relatively slow

CryptoTerm

Pros

  • Provides a single, unified platform for all terminal and file transfer needs.
  • Offers strong support for legacy systems like IBM mainframes.
  • Includes powerful automation tools for scripting and batch transfers.
  • Securely manages all credentials in an encrypted vault.
  • Maintains excellent compatibility across both old and new Windows versions.

Cons

  • Available only on Windows, with no macOS or Linux support.
  • The wide feature set may create a steep learning curve.
  • The interface can feel outdated compared to modern software.
  • Can be resource-intensive on older machines.
  • Its specialized nature may be overkill for users with simple needs.

Which one should you choose?

Choose AnyViewer if…

  • Quick and easy setup process
  • Smooth performance on most networks
  • Strong encryption ensures secure sessions
Get AnyViewer →

Choose CryptoTerm if…

  • Provides a single, unified platform for all terminal and file transfer needs.
  • Offers strong support for legacy systems like IBM mainframes.
  • Includes powerful automation tools for scripting and batch transfers.
Get CryptoTerm →

More comparisons

Looking wider? All AnyViewer alternatives · All CryptoTerm alternatives

Advertisement