Advertisement
AnyViewer vs CryptoTerm
Compared by Fileion editors from each app’s page · Updated
Key differences
- Only AnyViewer runs on Android, iOS and Mac.
- AnyViewer is free; CryptoTerm is paid.
- Both run on Windows.
Advertisement
Side by side
| Detail | AnyViewer | CryptoTerm |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Publisher | AOMEI | JT-Soft |
| License | Free | Paid |
| Slogan | Control anything, from anywhere | Your Universal Gateway to Secure Systems. |
| Platforms | ||
| WindowsSame | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mac | ✓ Yes | — No |
| Android | ✓ Yes | — No |
| iOS | ✓ Yes | — No |
| Latest version on Fileion | ||
| Windows | 5.6.0 · 64.7 MB | 2.92 · 9.7 MB |
| Mac | 3.6.0 · 36.2 MB | — |
| Android | 4.0 · 40.4 MB | — |
| iOS | 4.0.0 | — |
| On Fileion | ||
| Key features | 20 | 8 |
| FAQs answered | 11 | 18 |
No user ratings or download counts here until review and download data are reliable.
Key features
AnyViewer20 features
- Cross-platform access
- Fast and stable connections
- Multiple monitor support
- High-quality display
- Unattended access
- Black screen mode
- Remote input control
- Auto-lock screen
- + 12 more
CryptoTerm8 features
- Unified Session & Transfer Management
- Legacy System Support
- Credential Vault
- Session Recovery
- Custom Keyboard Mapping
- Batch Scripting & Automation
- Connection Dashboard
- Drag-and-Drop File Transfers
Pros and cons
AnyViewer
Pros
- Quick and easy setup process
- Smooth performance on most networks
- Strong encryption ensures secure sessions
- Secure connections with various encryption options
- Supports unattended remote access
Cons
- No support for macOS or Linux
- Free plan limits speed and devices
- Lacks advanced enterprise-level features
- Mobile connections may drop occasionally
- File transfers can be relatively slow
CryptoTerm
Pros
- Provides a single, unified platform for all terminal and file transfer needs.
- Offers strong support for legacy systems like IBM mainframes.
- Includes powerful automation tools for scripting and batch transfers.
- Securely manages all credentials in an encrypted vault.
- Maintains excellent compatibility across both old and new Windows versions.
Cons
- Available only on Windows, with no macOS or Linux support.
- The wide feature set may create a steep learning curve.
- The interface can feel outdated compared to modern software.
- Can be resource-intensive on older machines.
- Its specialized nature may be overkill for users with simple needs.
Which one should you choose?
Choose AnyViewer if…
- Quick and easy setup process
- Smooth performance on most networks
- Strong encryption ensures secure sessions
Choose CryptoTerm if…
- Provides a single, unified platform for all terminal and file transfer needs.
- Offers strong support for legacy systems like IBM mainframes.
- Includes powerful automation tools for scripting and batch transfers.
More comparisons
Looking wider? All AnyViewer alternatives · All CryptoTerm alternatives
Advertisement